English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Pre-reduction Graph Products: Hardnesses of Properly Learning DFAs and Approximating EDP on DAGs

Chalermsook, P., Laekhanukit, B., & Nanongkai, D. (2014). Pre-reduction Graph Products: Hardnesses of Properly Learning DFAs and Approximating EDP on DAGs. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.0828.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Genre: Paper
Latex : Pre-reduction Graph Products: Hardnesses of Properly Learning {DFA}s and Approximating {EDP} on {DAG}s

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
arXiv:1408.0828.pdf (Preprint), 2MB
Name:
arXiv:1408.0828.pdf
Description:
File downloaded from arXiv at 2014-12-02 09:48
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Chalermsook, Parinya1, Author           
Laekhanukit, Bundit2, Author
Nanongkai, Danupon1, Author                 
Affiliations:
1Algorithms and Complexity, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society, ou_24019              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Computer Science, Computational Complexity, cs.CC
 Abstract: The study of graph products is a major research topic and typically concerns the term $f(G*H)$, e.g., to show that $f(G*H)=f(G)f(H)$. In this paper, we study graph products in a non-standard form $f(R[G*H]$ where $R$ is a "reduction", a transformation of any graph into an instance of an intended optimization problem. We resolve some open problems as applications. (1) A tight $n^{1-\epsilon}$-approximation hardness for the minimum consistent deterministic finite automaton (DFA) problem, where $n$ is the sample size. Due to Board and Pitt [Theoretical Computer Science 1992], this implies the hardness of properly learning DFAs assuming $NP\neq RP$ (the weakest possible assumption). (2) A tight $n^{1/2-\epsilon}$ hardness for the edge-disjoint paths (EDP) problem on directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), where $n$ denotes the number of vertices. (3) A tight hardness of packing vertex-disjoint $k$-cycles for large $k$. (4) An alternative (and perhaps simpler) proof for the hardness of properly learning DNF, CNF and intersection of halfspaces [Alekhnovich et al., FOCS 2004 and J. Comput.Syst.Sci. 2008].

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2014-08-042014-08-04
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: 37 p.
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: arXiv: 1408.0828
URI: http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.0828
BibTex Citekey: DBLP:journals/corr/ChalermsookLN14
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source

show