English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Analysing uncertainties in the calculation of fluxes using whole-plant chambers: random and systematic errors

Pérez‑Priego, O., López-Ballesteros, A., Sánchez-Cañete, E. P., Serrano-Ortiz, P., Kutzbach, L., Domingo, F., et al. (2015). Analysing uncertainties in the calculation of fluxes using whole-plant chambers: random and systematic errors. Plant and Soil, 39(1-2), 229-244. doi:10.1007/s11104-015-2481-x.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
BGC2246.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
BGC2246.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, MJBK; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Pérez‑Priego, Oscar1, Author           
López-Ballesteros, Ana, Author
Sánchez-Cañete, Enrique P., Author
Serrano-Ortiz, Penélope, Author
Kutzbach, Lars, Author
Domingo, Francisco, Author
Eugster, Werner, Author
Kowalski, Andrew S., Author
Affiliations:
1Biosphere-Atmosphere Interactions and Experimentation, Dr. M. Migliavacca, Department Biogeochemical Integration, Dr. M. Reichstein, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society, ou_1938307              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Aims Gas exchange measurements on individual plants depend largely on chamber systems, and uncertainties and corrections in current flux calculation procedures require further assessment. Methods We present a practical study with novel methods for analyses of flux uncertainties in an original chamber design excluding soil fluxes and allowing simultaneous measurements of whole-plant photosynthesis and transpiration. Results Results indicate that random errors caused by IRGA noise and the lack of criteria to optimize the time window (TW) of chamber enclosure lead to significant flux uncertainties (12 %). Although enclosure should be rapid to minimize plant disturbances, longer TWs (3 min) increase confidence in flux estimates. Indeterminate stabilization periods in existing calculation protocols cause significant systematic errors. Stabilization times were identified via the change-point detection method, and flux uncertainties were reduced. Photosynthesis was overestimated by up to 28 % when not correcting the evolving CO2 molar fraction for water vapour dilution. Leakage can compromise flux estimates, but was negligible (ca. 2 %) here due to the large chamber-headspace and relatively small values of both collar contact length and closure time. Conclusions A bootstrapping, resampling-based flux calculation method is presented and recommended to better assess random errors and improve flux precision. We present practical recommendations for the use of whole-plant chambers.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2015-04-162015-04-302015
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: Other: BGC2246
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-015-2481-x
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Plant and Soil
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Dordrecht, etc. : Kluwer Academic Publishers [etc.]
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 39 (1-2) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 229 - 244 Identifier: ISSN: 0032-079X
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925434424