English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Greedy Is an Almost Optimal Deque

Chalermsook, P., Goswami, M., Kozma, L., Mehlhorn, K., & Saranurak, T. (2015). Greedy Is an Almost Optimal Deque. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.08319.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
arXiv:1506.08319.pdf (Preprint), 340KB
Name:
arXiv:1506.08319.pdf
Description:
File downloaded from arXiv at 2015-07-16 17:03 to be presented at WADS 2015
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Chalermsook, Parinya1, Author           
Goswami, Mayank1, Author           
Kozma, Laszlo2, Author
Mehlhorn, Kurt1, Author           
Saranurak, Thatchaphol1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Algorithms and Complexity, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society, ou_24019              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Computer Science, Data Structures and Algorithms, cs.DS
 Abstract: In this paper we extend the geometric binary search tree (BST) model of Demaine, Harmon, Iacono, Kane, and Patrascu (DHIKP) to accommodate for insertions and deletions. Within this extended model, we study the online Greedy BST algorithm introduced by DHIKP. Greedy BST is known to be equivalent to a maximally greedy (but inherently offline) algorithm introduced independently by Lucas in 1988 and Munro in 2000, conjectured to be dynamically optimal. With the application of forbidden-submatrix theory, we prove a quasilinear upper bound on the performance of Greedy BST on deque sequences. It has been conjectured (Tarjan, 1985) that splay trees (Sleator and Tarjan, 1983) can serve such sequences in linear time. Currently neither splay trees, nor other general-purpose BST algorithms are known to fulfill this requirement. As a special case, we show that Greedy BST can serve output-restricted deque sequences in linear time. A similar result is known for splay trees (Tarjan, 1985; Elmasry, 2004). As a further application of the insert-delete model, we give a simple proof that, given a set U of permutations of [n], the access cost of any BST algorithm is Omega(log |U| + n) on "most" of the permutations from U. In particular, this implies that the access cost for a random permutation of [n] is Omega(n log n) with high probability. Besides the splay tree noted before, Greedy BST has recently emerged as a plausible candidate for dynamic optimality. Compared to splay trees, much less effort has gone into analyzing Greedy BST. Our work is intended as a step towards a full understanding of Greedy BST, and we remark that forbidden-submatrix arguments seem particularly well suited for carrying out this program.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2015-06-272015
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: 15 p.
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: arXiv: 1506.08319
BibTex Citekey: Chalermsookabs/1506.08319
URI: http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.08319
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source

show