English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  A comparison of two sleep spindle detection methods based on all night averages: individually adjusted vs. fixed frequencies

Ujma, P. P., Gombos, F., Genzel, L., Konrad, B. N., Simor, P., Steiger, A., et al. (2015). A comparison of two sleep spindle detection methods based on all night averages: individually adjusted vs. fixed frequencies. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 9: 52. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00052.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
fnhum-09-00052.pdf (Any fulltext), 4MB
Name:
fnhum-09-00052.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Ujma, Peter Przemyslaw1, Author
Gombos, Ferenc1, Author
Genzel, Lisa1, Author
Konrad, Boris Nikolai2, Author           
Simor, Peter1, Author
Steiger, Axel2, Author           
Dresler, Martin1, 2, Author           
Bodizs, Robert1, Author
Affiliations:
1external, ou_persistent22              
2Dept. Clinical Research, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Max Planck Society, ou_2035296              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: EEG, sleep spindles, sigma waves, automatic detection, fixed frequenca mehtod, IAM, comparison
 Abstract: Sleep spindles are frequently studied for their relationship with state and trait cognitive variables, and they are thought to play an important role in sleep-related memory consolidation. Due to their frequent occurrence in NREM sleep, the detection of sleep spindles is only feasible using automatic algorithms, of which a large number is available. We compared subject averages of the spindle parameters computed by a fixed frequency (FixF) (11-13 Hz for slow spindles, 13-15 Hz for fast spindles) automatic detection algorithm and the individual adjustment method (IAM), which uses individual frequency bands for sleep spindle detection. Fast spindle duration and amplitude are strongly correlated in the two algorithms, but there is little overlap in fast spindle density and slow spindle parameters in general. The agreement between fixed and manually determined sleep spindle frequencies is limited, especially in case of slow spindles. This is the most likely reason for the poor agreement between the two detection methods in case of slow spindle parameters. Our results suggest that while various algorithms may reliably detect fast spindles, a more sophisticated algorithm primed to individual spindle frequencies is necessary for the detection of slow spindles as well as individual variations in the number of spindles in general.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2015-02-17
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: ISI: 000349433400001
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00052
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 9 Sequence Number: 52 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 1662-5161