English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Prediction, Bayesian inference and feedback in speech recognition

Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2016). Prediction, Bayesian inference and feedback in speech recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 4-18. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1081703.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Norris_McQueen_Cutler_2016.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
Name:
Norris_McQueen_Cutler_2016.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
2015
Copyright Info:
2015 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ 4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Norris, D.1, Author
McQueen, James M.2, 3, Author           
Cutler, Anne4, 5, Author           
Affiliations:
1MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK , ou_persistent22              
2Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, External Organizations, ou_55236              
3Research Associates, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Wundtlaan 1, 6525 XD Nijmegen, NL, ou_2344700              
4MARCS Institute, University of Western Sydney, Penrith South, NSW 2751, Australia , ou_persistent22              
5Emeriti, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Wundtlaan 1, 6525 XD Nijmegen, NL, ou_2344699              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Speech perception involves prediction, but how is that prediction implemented? In cognitive models prediction has often been taken to imply that there is feedback of activation from lexical to pre-lexical processes as implemented in interactive-activation models (IAMs). We show that simple activation feedback does not actually improve speech recognition. However, other forms of feedback can be beneficial. In particular, feedback can enable the listener to adapt to changing input, and can potentially help the listener to recognise unusual input, or recognise speech in the presence of competing sounds. The common feature of these helpful forms of feedback is that they are all ways of optimising the performance of speech recognition using Bayesian inference. That is, listeners make predictions about speech because speech recognition is optimal in the sense captured in Bayesian models.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 201520152016
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2015.1081703
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: London : Routledge
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 31 (1) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 4 - 18 Identifier: Other: ISSN
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/2327-3798