日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

  Why humans care about sunk costs while animals don't. An evolutionary explanation

Höffler, F. (2005). Why humans care about sunk costs while animals don't. An evolutionary explanation.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
資料種別: 成果報告書

ファイル

表示: ファイル

関連URL

表示:
非表示:
説明:
-
OA-Status:

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Höffler, Felix1, 著者           
所属:
1Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Max Planck Society, ou_2173688              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: Concorde fallacy, Sunk costs, Evolutionary game theory, Replicator Dynamics, Risk aversion
 要旨: While humans often care about sunk investment, animals are not subject to this sort of sunk cost behavior or "Concorde fallacy". This paper investigates a simple two stage decision problem under uncertainty. At the second stage, subjects can commit the Concorde fallacy by sticking to the first stage decision, independent of the state of nature revealed in-between. We investigate whether this can be beneficial in a standard payoff monotonic adaptation process. Committing the Concorde fallacy reduces the payoffs but accelerates the adaptation since it acts like "self-punishment". It will, however, not only reduce the population growth rate in the long run but also the population size at any point in time in a biological evolutionary process. In this sense, animals can never benefit from the Concorde fallacy. Risk aversion gives an extra benefit to a behavior that more rapidly learns to avoid bad outcomes. If the wrong initial decision leads occasionally, albeit very infrequently, to a very low payoff, then risk averse humans will be better off by committing the Concorde fallacy.

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語:
 日付: 2005
 出版の状態: 出版
 ページ: 23
 出版情報: Bonn : Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods
 目次: -
 査読: -
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): その他: 2005/17
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物

表示: