Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Emotion, rationality, and decision-making: How to link affective and social neuroscience with social theory

Verweij, M., Senior, T. J., Dominguez D., J. F., & Turner, R. (2015). Emotion, rationality, and decision-making: How to link affective and social neuroscience with social theory. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9: 332. doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00332.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
Verweij_2015.pdf (Verlagsversion), 594KB
Name:
Verweij_2015.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Verweij, Marco1, Autor
Senior, Timothy J.2, Autor
Dominguez D., Juan F.3, Autor
Turner, Robert4, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, Jacobs University Bremen, Germany, ou_persistent22              
2Digital Cultures Research Centre, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom, ou_persistent22              
3Social Neuroscience Lab, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, ou_persistent22              
4Department Neurophysics, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634550              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: Affective and social neuroscience; Plural rationality; Social and political theory; Somatic marker hypothesis
 Zusammenfassung: In this paper, we argue for a stronger engagement between concepts in affective and social neuroscience on the one hand, and theories from the fields of anthropology, economics, political science, and sociology on the other. Affective and social neuroscience could provide an additional assessment of social theories. We argue that some of the most influential social theories of the last four decades-rational choice theory, behavioral economics, and post-structuralism-contain assumptions that are inconsistent with key findings in affective and social neuroscience. We also show that another approach from the social sciences-plural rationality theory-shows greater compatibility with these findings. We further claim that, in their turn, social theories can strengthen affective and social neuroscience. The former can provide more precise formulations of the social phenomena that neuroscientific models have targeted, can help neuroscientists who build these models become more aware of their social and cultural biases, and can even improve the models themselves. To illustrate, we show how plural rationality theory can be used to further specify and test the somatic marker hypothesis. Thus, we aim to accelerate the much-needed merger of social theories with affective and social neuroscience.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2015-07-062015-09-042015-09-22
 Publikationsstatus: Online veröffentlicht
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2015.00332
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Frontiers in Neuroscience
  Andere : Front Neurosci
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 9 Artikelnummer: 332 Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: ISSN: 1662-4548
ISSN: 1662-453X
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/1662-4548