Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Never say no… How the brain interprets the pregnant pause in conversation.

Bögels, S., Kendrick, K. H., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). Never say no… How the brain interprets the pregnant pause in conversation. PLoS One, 10(12): e0145474. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145474.

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
journal.pone.0145474.pdf (Verlagsversion), 2MB
Name:
journal.pone.0145474.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
2015
Copyright Info:
© 2015 Bögels et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
externe Referenz:
Data availability (Ergänzendes Material)
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Bögels, Sara1, 2, Autor           
Kendrick, Kobin H.1, Autor           
Levinson, Stephen C.1, 2, 3, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Language and Cognition Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_792548              
2INTERACT, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Wundtlaan 1, 6525 XD Nijmegen, NL, ou_1863331              
3Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, External Organizations, ou_55236              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: In conversation, negative responses to invitations, requests, offers, and the like are more likely to occur with a delay – conversation analysts talk of them as dispreferred. Here we examine the contrastive cognitive load ‘yes’ and ‘no’ responses make, either when relatively fast (300 ms after question offset) or delayed (1000 ms). Participants heard short dialogues contrasting in speed and valence of response while having their EEG recorded. We found that a fast ‘no’ evokes an N400-effect relative to a fast ‘yes’; however this contrast disappeared in the delayed responses. 'No' responses however elicited a late frontal positivity both if they were fast and if they were delayed. We interpret these results as follows: a fast ‘no’ evoked an N400 because an immediate response is expected to be positive – this effect disappears as the response time lengthens because now in ordinary conversation the probability of a ‘no’ has increased. However, regardless of the latency of response, a ‘no’ response is associated with a late positivity, since a negative response is always dispreferred. Together these results show that negative responses to social actions exact a higher cognitive load, but especially when least expected, in immediate response.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2015-12-092015-12-23
 Publikationsstatus: Online veröffentlicht
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145474
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden: ausblenden:
Projektname : INTERACT
Grant ID : 269484
Förderprogramm : Funding Programme 7 (FP7)
Förderorganisation : European Commission (EC)

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: PLoS One
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 10 (12) Artikelnummer: e0145474 Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: ISSN: 1932-6203
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/1000000000277850