English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  TRIPS and Corporate Social Responsibility: Unethical Equals Unfair Business Practices?

Henning-Bodewig, F. (2016). TRIPS and Corporate Social Responsibility: Unethical Equals Unfair Business Practices? In H. Ullrich, R. M. Hilty, M. Lamping, & J. Drexl (Eds.), TRIPS plus 20 - From Trade Rules to Market Principles (pp. 701-724). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Genre: Contribution to Collected Edition

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Henning-Bodewig, Frauke1, Author           
Affiliations:
1MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society, ou_2035291              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: The overall purpose of TRIPS is not only to further competition but also to further fair competition. This is, however, done rather indirectly through the implementation of IP rights and the determination of their scope and limitations. Apart from this, TRIPS does not monitor acts in trade and commerce under the aspect of commercial fairness. In particular, TRIPS does not deal with commercial practices in connection with the negative side effects of a globalized economy, which, for instance, outsources production to countries with laxer standards in the field of labour, environment, and human rights. If at all, this is regarded as the domain of Article 10bis of the Paris Convention, which expressly prohibits “any act contrary to honest practices in industrial or commercial matters”. This paper addresses the issue of whether Article 10bis of the Paris Convention is part of TRIPS—or whether TRIPS could at least be interpreted in such a manner as to (directly or indirectly) include a general prohibition of unfair competition. As a second step it addresses the question of whether the obligation to combat unfair commercial practices under the Paris Convention (and possibly also under TRIPS) in its turn can be extended to cases where a company disregards its own pledges of commitment to so-called “corporate social responsibility”. This relatively new strategy used frequently by multinational companies tries to establish a favourable image in the public perception—typically by more or less explicitly pledging to respect certain principles of “business ethics”. Can non-compliance with one’s own standards of corporate social responsibility, often presented on the company’s website, be contrary to “honest practices” pursuant to Article 10bis of the Paris Convention? And if so, can this in its turn (also) be in breach of TRIPS?

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2016
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-48107-3_23
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: TRIPS plus 20 - From Trade Rules to Market Principles
Source Genre: Collected Edition
 Creator(s):
Ullrich, Hanns1, Editor           
Hilty, Reto M.1, Editor           
Lamping, Matthias1, Editor           
Drexl, Josef1, Editor           
Affiliations:
1 MPI for Innovation and Competition, Max Planck Society, ou_2035291            
Publ. Info: Berlin ; Heidelberg : Springer
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 701 - 724 Identifier: ISBN: 978-3-662-48106-6

Source 2

show
hide
Title: MPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Source Genre: Series
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 25 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: -