English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Neural correlates of auditory feedback processing during speech production

Franken, M. K., Schoffelen, J.-M., McQueen, J. M., Acheson, D. J., Hagoort, P., & Eisner, F. (2016). Neural correlates of auditory feedback processing during speech production. Poster presented at New Sounds 2016: 8th International Conference on Second-Language Speech, Aarhus, Denmark.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Franken, Matthias K.1, 2, Author           
Schoffelen, Jan-Mathijs1, 2, Author           
McQueen, James M.1, 2, 3, Author           
Acheson, Daniel J.1, 2, Author           
Hagoort, Peter1, 2, Author           
Eisner, Frank1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, ou_55236              
2Neurobiology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_792551              
3Behavioural Sciences Institute, Radboud University, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: speech production speech perception auditory feedback MEG
 Abstract: An important aspect of L2 speech learning is the interaction between speech production and perception. One way to study this interaction is to provide speakers with altered auditory feedback to investigate how unexpected auditory feedback affects subsequent speech production. Although it is generally well established that speakers on average compensate for auditory feedback perturbations, even when unaware of the manipulation, the neural correlates of responses to perturbed auditory feedback are not well understood. In the present study, we provided speakers with auditory feedback that was intermittently pitch-shifted, while we measured the speaker’s neural activity using magneto-encephalography (MEG). Participants were instructed to vocalize the Dutch vowel /e/ while they tried to match the pitch of a short tone. During vocalization, participants received auditory feedback through headphones. In half of the trials, the pitch in the feedback signal was shifted by -25 cents, starting at a jittered delay after speech onset and lasting for 500ms. Trials with perturbed feedback and control trials (with normal feedback) were in random order. Post-experiment questionnaires showed that none of the participants was aware of the pitch manipulation. Behaviorally, the results show that participants on average compensated for the auditory feedback by shifting the pitch of their speech in the opposite (upward) direction. This suggests that even though participants were not aware of the pitch shift, they automatically compensate for the unexpected feedback signal. The MEG results show a right-lateralized response to both onset and offset of the pitch perturbation during speaking. We suggest this response relates to detection of the mismatch between the predicted and perceived feedback signals, which could subsequently drive behavioral adjustments. These results are in line with recent models of speech motor control and provide further insights into the neural correlates of speech production and speech feedback processing.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2016-02-15
 Publication Status: Not specified
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: -
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: New Sounds 2016: 8th International Conference on Second-Language Speech
Place of Event: Aarhus, Denmark
Start-/End Date: 2016-06-10 - 2016-06-12

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source

show