English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Small global-mean cooling due to volcanic radiative forcing

Gregory, J., Andrews, T., Good, P., Mauritsen, T., & Forster, P. (2016). Small global-mean cooling due to volcanic radiative forcing. Climate Dynamics, 47, 3979-3991. doi:10.1007/s00382-016-3055-1.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
10.1007-00382-016-3055-1.pdf (Publisher version), 856KB
Name:
10.1007-00382-016-3055-1.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Gregory, J.M.1, Author
Andrews, T.1, Author
Good, P.1, Author
Mauritsen, T.2, Author           
Forster, P.M.1, Author
Affiliations:
1external, ou_persistent22              
2Climate Dynamics, The Atmosphere in the Earth System, MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society, ou_913568              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Aerosol, Climate sensitivity, Ocean heat uptake, Radiative forcing, Transient climate response, Volcano
 Abstract: In both the observational record and atmosphere-ocean general circulation model (AOGCM) simulations of the last (Formula presented.)150 years, short-lived negative radiative forcing due to volcanic aerosol, following explosive eruptions, causes sudden global-mean cooling of up to (Formula presented.)0.3 K. This is about five times smaller than expected from the transient climate response parameter (TCRP, K of global-mean surface air temperature change per W m−2 of radiative forcing increase) evaluated under atmospheric CO2 concentration increasing at 1 % yr−1. Using the step model (Good et al. in Geophys Res Lett 38:L01703, 2011. doi:10.1029/2010GL045208), we confirm the previous finding (Held et al. in J Clim 23:2418–2427, 2010. doi:10.1175/2009JCLI3466.1) that the main reason for the discrepancy is the damping of the response to short-lived forcing by the thermal inertia of the upper ocean. Although the step model includes this effect, it still overestimates the volcanic cooling simulated by AOGCMs by about 60 %. We show that this remaining discrepancy can be explained by the magnitude of the volcanic forcing, which may be smaller in AOGCMs (by 30 % for the HadCM3 AOGCM) than in off-line calculations that do not account for rapid cloud adjustment, and the climate sensitivity parameter, which may be smaller than for increasing CO2 (40 % smaller than for 4 × CO2 in HadCM3). © 2016 The Author(s)

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2016-03-022016-03
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1007/s00382-016-3055-1
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Climate Dynamics
  Other : Clim. Dyn.
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Heidelberg : Springer-International
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 47 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 3979 - 3991 Identifier: ISSN: 0930-7575
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925568800