日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

  Comparison of inflow effects in FLASH- and bSSFP-based BOLD fMRI at 9.4T

Scheffler, K., & Ehses, P. (2015). Comparison of inflow effects in FLASH- and bSSFP-based BOLD fMRI at 9.4T. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 28(Supplement 1), S247-S248.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
資料種別: 会議抄録

ファイル

表示: ファイル

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Scheffler, K1, 著者           
Ehses, P1, 著者           
所属:
1Department High-Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497796              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: -
 要旨: Purpose/Introduction: The use of bSSFP to detect BOLD was introduced in 2001 [1], and since then, different variants of bSSFP have been investigated [2]. At 9.4T, the original stopband method [1], which is based on BOLD-related frequency and T2-changes, is too instable, as breathing or small motion induces frequency shifts of 20–100 Hz. But even for passband bSSFP, a very short TR is mandatory at 9.4T to minimize banding artifacts, especially for whole-brain coverage. The goal of this study is to compare BOLDrelated signal contributions in 3D FLASH and bSSFP acquisitions. Subjects and Methods: All experiments were performed at 9.4T on two healthy volunteers with IRB approval. A custom-built head coil [3] was used for signal transmission/reception. Slab-selective bSSFP and FLASH experiments were performed at 1 mm resolution with two slab thicknesses (18 mm and 36 mm). The acquisition time was kept constant by adjusting the slice oversampling factor (100 and 0 in the 18 mm and 36 mm experiments, respectively). Other parameters: TR = 3.8 ms, TE = 1.9 ms, FA = 12, GRAPPA R = 3, 6/8 partial Fourier (POCS reconstruction), volumeTA = 3.25 s. In addition, whole brain experiments with nonselective excitation were performed at 1.2 mm resolution (TR = 2.6 ms, TE = 1.3 ms, FA = 12, CAIPIRINHA [6] R = 2 9 4D=2, 6/8 partial Fourier, volumeTA = 3 s). The fMRI paradigm consisted of a flickering radial checker-board which was presented ten times in alternating six frames off- and on-periods. For analysis, the data were processed with FSL FEAT [7]. Results: Despite the short TE, strong activation is observed in the slab-selective FLASH experiments, whereas activation in the nonselective FLASH experiment is only visible in large vessels. In contrast, strong BOLD activation can be found in all three bSSFP experiments (Fig. 1). Discussion/Conclusion: The FLASH acquisitions show a significant inflow effect for small slabs, and almost no activation for whole-brain excitation. This indicates that the T2*-related contributions to BOLD are negligible for FLASH, and thus also for bSSFP. From this can be concluded that the observed BOLD activation in slab-selective bSSFP is related to inflow, T2 and diffusion effects, whereas whole-brain bSSFP shows a pure T2 and diffusion contrast similar to a spin-echo. This is also supported by Monte-Carlo simulations and thus suggests a much more confined effect to small vessels as compared to T2*- weighted acquisitions. This also indicates a reduced sensitivity to larger draining veins and thus higher spatial specificity.

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語:
 日付: 2015-10
 出版の状態: 出版
 ページ: -
 出版情報: -
 目次: -
 査読: -
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): DOI: 10.1007/s10334-015-0488-1
BibTex参照ID: SchefflerE2015_3
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:
非表示:
イベント名: 32nd Annual Scientific Meeting ESMRMB 2015
開催地: Edinburgh, UK
開始日・終了日: -

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物 1

表示:
非表示:
出版物名: Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
種別: 学術雑誌
 著者・編者:
所属:
出版社, 出版地: -
ページ: - 巻号: 28 (Supplement 1) 通巻号: - 開始・終了ページ: S247 - S248 識別子(ISBN, ISSN, DOIなど): -