English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Dynamics of self-monitoring and error detection in speech production: Evidence from mental imagery and MEG

Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2015). Dynamics of self-monitoring and error detection in speech production: Evidence from mental imagery and MEG. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(2), 352-364. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00692.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Tian, Xing1, Author
Poeppel, David1, 2, Author           
Affiliations:
1New York University, New York, USA, ou_persistent22              
2Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2421697              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: DELAYED AUDITORY-FEEDBACK ; IMAGINED HAND MOVEMENTS ; STUTTERING ; FREQUENCY ; MOTOR CONTROL ; CORTEX ; PERCEPTION ; PITCH ; INTEGRATION ; BRAIN ; MAGNITUDE ; Neurosciences ; Psychology, Experimental
 Abstract: A critical subroutine of self-monitoring during speech production is to detect any deviance between expected and actual auditory feedback. Here we investigated the associated neural dynamics using MEG recording in mental-imagery-of-speech paradigms. Participants covertly articulated the vowel /a/; their own (individually recorded) speech was played back, with parametric manipulation using four levels of pitch shift, crossed with four levels of onset delay. A nonmonotonic function was observed in early auditory responses when the onset delay was shorter than 100 msec: Suppression was observed for normal playback, but enhancement for pitch-shifted playback; however, the magnitude of enhancement decreased at the largest level of pitch shift that was out of pitch range for normal conversion, as suggested in two behavioral experiments. No difference was observed among different types of playback when the onset delay was longer than 100 msec. These results suggest that the prediction suppresses the response to normal feedback, which mediates source monitoring. When auditory feedback does not match the prediction, an "error term" is generated, which underlies deviance detection. We argue that, based on the observed nonmonotonic function, a frequency window (addressing spectral difference) and a time window (constraining temporal difference) jointly regulate the comparison between prediction and feedback in speech.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2014-07-252015-02
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00692
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Cambridge, MA : MIT Press Journals
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 27 (2) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 352 - 364 Identifier: ISSN: 0898-929X
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/991042752752726