English

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Accuracy of binary black hole waveform models for aligned-spin binaries

Kumar, P., Chu, T., Fong, H., Pfeiffer, H. P., Boyle, M., Hemberger, D. A., et al. (2016). Accuracy of binary black hole waveform models for aligned-spin binaries. Physical Review D, 93: 104050. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.104050.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
1601.05396.pdf (Preprint), 10MB
Name:
1601.05396.pdf
Description:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
-
-
:
PRD93_104050.pdf (Publisher version), 17MB

-
Name:
PRD93_104050.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute), Potsdam-Golm; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
-
-
-

show

Creators

show
hide
Creators:
Kumar, Prayush, Author
Chu, Tony, Author
Fong, Heather, Author
Pfeiffer, Harald P.1, Author
Boyle, Michael, Author
Hemberger, Daniel A., Author
Kidder, Lawrence E., Author
Scheel, Mark A., Author
Szilagyi, B.1, Author
Affiliations:
1Astrophysical Relativity, AEI-Golm, MPI for Gravitational Physics, Max Planck Society, ou_24013

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology, gr-qc,
Abstract: Coalescing binary black holes are among the primary science targets for second generation ground-based gravitational wave (GW) detectors. Reliable GW models are central to detection of such systems and subsequent parameter estimation. This paper performs a comprehensive analysis of the accuracy of recent waveform models for binary black holes with aligned spins, utilizing a new set of $84$ high-accuracy numerical relativity simulations. Our analysis covers comparable mass binaries ($1\le m_1/m_2\le 3$), and samples independently both black hole spins up to dimensionless spin-magnitude of $0.9$ for equal-mass binaries and $0.85$ for unequal mass binaries. Furthermore, we focus on the high-mass regime (total mass $\gtrsim 50M_\odot$). The two most recent waveform models considered (PhenomD and SEOBNRv2) both perform very well for signal detection, losing less than 0.5\% of the recoverable signal-to-noise ratio $\rho$, except that SEOBNRv2's efficiency drops mildly for both black hole spins aligned with large magnitude. For parameter estimation, modeling inaccuracies of SEOBNRv2 are found to be smaller than systematic uncertainties for moderately strong GW events up to roughly $\rho\lesssim 15$. PhenomD's modeling errors are found to be smaller than SEOBNRv2's, and are generally irrelevant for $\rho\lesssim 20$. Both models' accuracy deteriorates with increased mass-ratio, and when at least one black hole spin is large and aligned. The SEOBNRv2 model shows a pronounced disagreement with the numerical relativity simulation in the merger phase, for unequal masses and simultaneously both black hole spins very large and aligned. Two older waveform models (PhenomC and SEOBNRv1) are found to be distinctly less accurate than the more recent PhenomD and SEOBNRv2 models. Finally, we quantify the bias expected from all GW models during parameter estimation for recovery of binary's masses and spins.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
Dates: 2016-01-202016-01-282016
Publication Status: Published in print
Pages: 24 pages, 15 figures, minor changes
Publishing info: -
Rev. Method: -
Identifiers: arXiv: 1601.05396
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.93.104050
URI: http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.05396
Degree: -

show

show

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Physical Review D
Other : Phys. Rev. D.
Source Genre: Journal
Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Lancaster, Pa. : American Physical Society
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 93 Sequence Number: 104050 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 0556-2821
CoNE: /journals/resource/111088197762258