English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  A trade-off between somatosensory and auditory related brain activity during object naming but not reading

Seghier, M. L., Hope, T. M., Prejawa, S., Jones Parker, O., Vitkovitch, M., & Price, C. J. (2015). A trade-off between somatosensory and auditory related brain activity during object naming but not reading. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(11), 4751-4759. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2292-14.2015.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Seghier_2015.pdf (Publisher version), 3MB
Name:
Seghier_2015.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Description:
-
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Seghier, Mohamed L.1, Author
Hope, Thomas M.H.1, Author
Prejawa, Suse1, Author           
Jones Parker, Oiwi1, 2, Author
Vitkovitch, Melanie3, Author
Price, Cathy J.1, Author
Affiliations:
1Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, United Kingdom, ou_persistent22              
2Wolfson College, University of Oxford, United Kingdom, ou_persistent22              
3School of Psychology, University of East London, University College London, United Kingdom, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Functional MRI; Naming; Parietal operculum; Reading; Somatosensory cortex; Speech production
 Abstract: The parietal operculum, particularly the cytoarchitectonic area OP1 of the secondary somatosensory area (SII), is involved in somatosensory feedback. Using fMRI with 58 human subjects, we investigated task-dependent differences in SII/OP1 activity during three familiar speech production tasks: object naming, reading and repeatedly saying “1-2-3.” Bilateral SII/OP1 was significantly suppressed (relative to rest) during object naming, to a lesser extent when repeatedly saying “1-2-3” and not at all during reading. These results cannot be explained by task difficulty but the contrasting difference between naming and reading illustrates how the demands on somatosensory activity change with task, even when motor output (i.e., production of object names) is matched. To investigate what determined SII/OP1 deactivation during object naming, we searched the whole brain for areas where activity increased as that in SII/OP1 decreased. This across subject covariance analysis revealed a region in the right superior temporal sulcus (STS) that lies within the auditory cortex, and is activated by auditory feedback during speech production. The tradeoff between activity in SII/OP1 and STS was not observed during reading, which showed significantly more activation than naming in both SII/OP1 and STS bilaterally. These findings suggest that, although object naming is more error prone than reading, subjects can afford to rely more or less on somatosensory or auditory feedback during naming. In contrast, fast and efficient error-free reading places more consistent demands on both types of feedback, perhaps because of the potential for increased competition between lexical and sublexical codes at the articulatory level.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2015-01-052014-06-052015-01-092015-03-18
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2292-14.2015
PMID: 25788691
PMC: PMC4363398
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: The Journal of Neuroscience
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Washington, DC : Society of Neuroscience
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 35 (11) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 4751 - 4759 Identifier: ISSN: 0270-6474
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925502187_1