English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Human impact on wildfires varies between regions and with vegetation productivity

Lasslop, G., & Kloster, S. (2017). Human impact on wildfires varies between regions and with vegetation productivity. Environmental Research Letters, 12: 115011. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa8c82.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
LasslopKlosterERL2017.tar.gz (Supplementary material), 2MB
Name:
LasslopKlosterERL2017.tar.gz
Description:
Supplementary Material
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/gzip / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
The authors
License:
-
:
Lasslop_2017_Environ._Res._Lett._12_115011.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
Name:
Lasslop_2017_Environ._Res._Lett._12_115011.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Lasslop, Gitta1, Author           
Kloster, Silvia1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Emmy Noether Junior Research Group Fire in the Earth System, The Land in the Earth System, MPI for Meteorology, Max Planck Society, ou_913563              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: We assess the influence of humans on burned area simulated with a dynamic global vegetation model. The human impact in the model is based on population density and cropland fraction, which were identified as important drivers of burned area in analyses of global datasets, and are commonly used in global models. After an evaluation of the sensitivity to these two variables we extend the model by including an additional effect of the cropland fraction on the fire duration. The general pattern of human influence is similar in both model versions: the strongest human impact is found in regions with intermediate productivity, where fire occurrence is not limited by fuel load or climatic conditions. Human effects in the model increases burned area in the tropics, while in temperate regions burned area is reduced. While the population density is similar on average for the tropical and temperate regions, the cropland fraction is higher in temperate regions, and leads to a strong suppression of fire. The model shows a low human impact in the boreal region, where both population density and cropland fraction is very low and the climatic conditions, as well as the vegetation productivity limit fire. Previous studies attributed a decrease in fire activity found in global charcoal datasets to human activity. This is confirmed by our simulations, which only show a decrease in burned area when the human influence on fire is accounted for, and not with only natural effects on fires. We assess how the vegetation–fire feedback influences the results, by comparing simulations with dynamic vegetation biogeography to simulations with prescribed vegetation. The vegetation–fire feedback increases the human impact on burned area by 10% for present day conditions. These results emphasize that projections of burned area need to account for the interactions between fire, climate, vegetation and humans.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2016-092017-092017-112017-11
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aa8c82
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Environmental Research Letters
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Bristol : Institute of Physics
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 12 Sequence Number: 115011 Start / End Page: - Identifier: Other: 1748-9326
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/1748-9326