English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  The acquisition of verb-argument and verb-noun category biases in a novel word learning task

Weber, K., Meyer, A. S., & Hagoort, P. (2016). The acquisition of verb-argument and verb-noun category biases in a novel word learning task. Poster presented at Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP 2016), Bilbao, Spain.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Weber, Kirsten1, Author           
Meyer, Antje S.2, Author           
Hagoort, Peter1, 3, Author           
Affiliations:
1Neurobiology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_792551              
2Psychology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_792545              
3Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, External Organizations, ou_55236              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: We show that language users readily learn the probabilities of novel lexical cues to syntactic information (verbs biasing towards a prepositional object dative vs. double-object dative and words biasing towards a verb vs. noun reading) and use these biases in a subsequent production task. In a one-hour exposure phase participants read 12 novel lexical items, embedded in 30 sentence contexts each, in their native language. The items were either strongly (100%) biased towards one grammatical frame or syntactic category assignment or unbiased (50%). The next day participants produced sentences with the newly learned lexical items. They were given the sentence beginning up to the novel lexical item. Their output showed that they were highly sensitive to the biases introduced in the exposure phase.
Given this rapid learning and use of novel lexical cues, this paradigm opens up new avenues to test sentence processing theories. Thus, with close control on the biases participants are acquiring, competition between different frames or category assignments can be investigated using reaction times or neuroimaging methods.
Generally, these results show that language users adapt to the statistics of the linguistic input, even to subtle lexically-driven cues to syntactic information.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2016
 Publication Status: Not specified
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: -
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP 2016)
Place of Event: Bilbao, Spain
Start-/End Date: 2016-09-01 - 2016-09-03

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source

show