English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Influences on and measures of unintentional group synchrony

Ellamil, M., Berson, J., & Margulies, D. S. (2016). Influences on and measures of unintentional group synchrony. Frontiers in Psychology, 7: 1744. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01744.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002B-AEC4-D Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-1E56-C
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Ellamil_2016.pdf (Publisher version), 196KB
Name:
Ellamil_2016.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Ellamil, Melissa1, Author              
Berson, Josh1, Author              
Margulies, Daniel S.1, Author              
Affiliations:
1Max Planck Research Group Neuroanatomy and Connectivity, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_1356546              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Group synchrony; Interpersonal coordination; Collective experience; Group processes; Social interaction
 Abstract: Many instances of large-scale coordination occur in real-life social situations without the explicit awareness of the individuals involved. While the majority of research to date has examined dyadic interactions – those between two individuals – during intentional or deliberate coordination, the present review surveys the handful of recent studies investigating behavioral and physiological synchrony across groups of more than two people when coordination was not an explicit goal. Both minimal (e.g., visual information, shared location) and naturalistic (e.g., choir singing part, family relationship) group interactions appear to promote unintentional group synchrony although they have so far only been studied separately. State differences in unintentional group synchrony, or the relative presence of coordination in various conditions, have tended to be assessed differently, such as using correlation-type relationships, compared to its temporal dynamics, or changes over time in the degree of coordination, which appear to be best captured using phase differences. Simultaneously evaluating behavioral, physiological, and social responses as well systematically comparing different synchrony measures could further our understanding of the influences on and measures of group synchrony, allowing us to move away from studying individual persons responding to static laboratory stimuli and towards investigating collective experiences in natural, dynamic social interactions.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2016-06-102016-10-242016-11-09
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01744
PMID: 27881968
PMC: PMC5101201
Other: eCollection 2016
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Frontiers in Psychology
  Abbreviation : Front Psychol
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Pully, Switzerland : Frontiers Research Foundation
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 7 Sequence Number: 1744 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 1664-1078
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/1664-1078