English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Do animals and furniture items elicit different brain responses in human infants?

Jeschonek, S., Marinovic, V., Hoehl, S., Elsner, B., & Pauen, S. (2010). Do animals and furniture items elicit different brain responses in human infants? Brain & Development, 32(10), 863-871. doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2009.11.010.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Jeschonek, Susanna1, Author
Marinovic, Vesna1, Author
Hoehl, Stefanie1, Author           
Elsner, Birgit2, Author
Pauen, Sabina1, Author
Affiliations:
1Institute of Psychology, University of Heidelberg, Germany, ou_persistent22              
2Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Germany, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Categorization; Infants; Event-related-potentials; ERP; Nc; PSW; Category priming; Animate–inanmiate distinction
 Abstract: One of the earliest categorical distinctions to be made by preverbal infants is the animate–inanimate distinction. To explore the neural basis for this distinction in 7–8-month-olds, an equal number of animal and furniture pictures was presented in an ERP-paradigm. The total of 118 pictures, all looking different from each other, were presented in a semi-randomized order for 1000 ms each. Infants’ brain responses to exemplars from both categories differed systematically regarding the negative central component (Nc: 400–600 ms) at anterior channels. More specifically, the Nc was enhanced for animals in one subgroup of infants, and for furniture items in another subgroup of infants. Explorative analyses related to categorical priming further revealed category-specific differences in brain responses in the late time window (650–1550 ms) at right frontal channels: Unprimed stimuli (preceded by a different-category item) elicited a more positive response as compared to primed stimuli (preceded by a same-category item). In sum, these findings suggest that the infant’s brain discriminates exemplars from both global domains. Given the design of our task, we conclude that processes of category identification are more likely to account for our findings than processes of on-line category formation during the experimental session.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2006-11-102009-07-312009-11-202009-12-222010-11
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2009.11.010
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Brain & Development
  Other : Brain Dev.
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Tokyo : Elsevier
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 32 (10) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 863 - 871 Identifier: ISSN: 0387-7604
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954927558516