Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Exercise versus nonexercise activity: E-diaries unravel distinct effects on mood

Reichert, M., Tost, H., Reinhard, I., Schlotz, W., Zipf, A., Salize, H. J., et al. (2017). Exercise versus nonexercise activity: E-diaries unravel distinct effects on mood. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 49(4), 763-773. doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000001149.

Item is

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Reichert, M., Autor
Tost, H., Autor
Reinhard, I., Autor
Schlotz, Wolff1, Autor           
Zipf, A., Autor
Salize, H. J., Autor
Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Autor
Ebner-Priemer, U. W., Autor
Affiliations:
1Scientific Services, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2421698              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: INTRODUCTION: The association between physical activity and mood is of major importance to increase physical activity as a prevention strategy for noncommunicable diseases and to improve mental health. Unfortunately, existing studies examining how physical activity and mood wax and wane within persons over time in everyday life do show ambiguous findings. Taking a closer look at these studies reveals that the aggregation levels differ tremendously. Whereas mood is conceptualized as a three-dimensional construct, physical activity is treated as a global construct not taking into account its distinct components like exercise (such as jogging) and nonexercise activity (NEA; such as climbing stairs). METHODS: To overcome these limitations, we conducted an ambulatory assessment study on the everyday life of 106 adults over 7 d continuously measuring NEA via accelerometers and repeatedly querying for mood in real time via GPS-triggered e-diaries. We used multilevel modeling to derive differential within-subject effects of exercise versus NEA on mood and to conduct analyses on the temporal course of effects. RESULTS: Analyses revealed that exercise increased valence (beta = 0.023; P < 0.05) and calmness (beta = 0.022; P < 0.05). A tendency of decreasing energetic arousal (beta = -0.029) lacked significance. NEA, parameterized as 15-min episodes of physical activity intensity in everyday life, increased energetic arousal (beta = 0.135; P < 0.001) and decreased calmness (stand. beta = -0.080; P < 0.001). A tendency of increasing valence (beta = 0.014) lacked significance. Using longer time intervals for NEA revealed similar findings, thus confirming our findings. CONCLUSION: Exercise and NEA differed regarding their within-subject effects on mood, whereas exercise increased valence and calmness, NEA increased energetic arousal and decreased calmness. Therefore, it appears necessary to clearly differentiate between exercise and NEA regarding their within-subject effects on mood dimensions in both research and treatment.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2017
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: Anderer: 27824691
DOI: 10.1249/mss.0000000000001149
ISSN: 0195-9131
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  Alternativer Titel : Medicine and science in sports and exercise
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Wolters Kluwer
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 49 (4) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 763 - 773 Identifikator: -