English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Lucid Data Dreaming for Multiple Object Tracking

Khoreva, A., Benenson, R., Ilg, E., Brox, T., & Schiele, B. (2017). Lucid Data Dreaming for Multiple Object Tracking. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.09554.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Genre: Paper
Other : Lucid Data Dreaming for Object Tracking

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
1703.09554v2 (Preprint), 12MB
Name:
1703.09554v2
Description:
File downloaded from arXiv at 2017-11-02 14:40
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Khoreva, Anna1, Author           
Benenson, Rodrigo2, Author           
Ilg, Eddy2, Author
Brox, Thomas2, Author
Schiele, Bernt1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Computer Vision and Multimodal Computing, MPI for Informatics, Max Planck Society, ou_1116547              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Computer Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, cs.CV
 Abstract: Convolutional networks reach top quality in pixel-level object tracking but require a large amount of training data (1k ~ 10k) to deliver such results. We propose a new training strategy which achieves state-of-the-art results across three evaluation datasets while using 20x ~ 100x less annotated data than competing methods. Instead of using large training sets hoping to generalize across domains, we generate in-domain training data using the provided annotation on the first frame of each video to synthesize ("lucid dream") plausible future video frames. In-domain per-video training data allows us to train high quality appearance- and motion-based models, as well as tune the post-processing stage. This approach allows to reach competitive results even when training from only a single annotated frame, without ImageNet pre-training. Our results indicate that using a larger training set is not automatically better, and that for the tracking task a smaller training set that is closer to the target domain is more effective. This changes the mindset regarding how many training samples and general "objectness" knowledge are required for the object tracking task.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2017-03-282017
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: 17 p.
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: arXiv: 1703.09554
URI: http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.09554
BibTex Citekey: khoreva_lucid_dreams17
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source

show