日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

  Eye movements in implicit artificial grammar learning

Silva, S., Inácio, F., Folia, V., & Petersson, K. M. (2017). Eye movements in implicit artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(9), 1387-1402. doi:10.1037/xlm0000350.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
資料種別: 学術論文

ファイル

表示: ファイル
非表示: ファイル
:
silva et al 2017 eye movements.pdf (出版社版), 2MB
ファイルのパーマリンク:
https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002E-85A5-6
ファイル名:
silva et al 2017 eye movements.pdf
説明:
-
OA-Status:
閲覧制限:
公開
MIMEタイプ / チェックサム:
application/pdf / [MD5]
技術的なメタデータ:
著作権日付:
2017
著作権情報:
© 2017 American Psychological Association
CCライセンス:
-

関連URL

表示:

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Silva, Susana1, 2, 著者
Inácio, Filomena2, 著者
Folia, Vasiliki3, 著者           
Petersson, Karl Magnus2, 3, 著者           
所属:
1University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, ou_persistent22              
2University of Algarve, Faro, Portugal, ou_persistent22              
3Neurobiology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_792551              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: eye-tracking, implicit learning, artificial grammar learning, suntactic processing, preference classification
 要旨: Artificial grammar learning (AGL) has been probed with forced-choice behavioral tests (active tests). Recent attempts to probe the outcomes of learning (implicitly acquired knowledge) with eye-movement responses (passive tests) have shown null results. However, these latter studies have not tested for sensitivity effects, for example, increased eye movements on a printed violation. In this study, we tested for sensitivity effects in AGL tests with (Experiment 1) and without (Experiment 2) concurrent active tests (preference- and grammaticality classification) in an eye-tracking experiment. Eye movements discriminated between sequence types in passive tests and more so in active tests. The eye-movement profile did not differ between preference and grammaticality classification, and it resembled sensitivity effects commonly observed in natural syntax processing. Our findings show that the outcomes of implicit structured sequence learning can be characterized in eye tracking. More specifically, whole trial measures (dwell time, number of fixations) showed robust AGL effects, whereas first-pass measures (first-fixation duration) did not. Furthermore, our findings strengthen the link between artificial and natural syntax processing, and they shed light on the factors that determine performance differences in preference and grammaticality classification tests

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語: eng - English
 日付: 2016-11-222016-04-202016-07-1220172017
 出版の状態: 出版
 ページ: -
 出版情報: -
 目次: -
 査読: 査読あり
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000350
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物 1

表示:
非表示:
出版物名: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
種別: 学術雑誌
 著者・編者:
所属:
出版社, 出版地: Washington, D.C. : American Psychological Association (PsycARTICLES)
ページ: - 巻号: 43 (9) 通巻号: - 開始・終了ページ: 1387 - 1402 識別子(ISBN, ISSN, DOIなど): ISSN: 0278-7393
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954927606766