ausblenden:
Schlagwörter:
In-situ Observations; Earth Observations; Biosphere Atmosphere Change Index
Zusammenfassung:
Extreme hydrometeorological conditions typically impact ecophysiological processes of terrestrial vegetation. Satellite based observations of the terrestrial biosphere provide an important reference for detecting and describing the spatiotemporal development of such events. However, in-depth investigations of ecological processes during extreme events require additional in-situ observations. The question is if the density of existing ecological in-situ networks is sufficient for analyzing the impact of extreme events, or what are expected event detection rates of ecological in-situ networks of a given size. To assess these issues, we build a baseline of extreme reductions in the Fraction of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FAPAR), identified by a new event detection method tailored to identify extremes of regional relevance. We then investigate the event detection success rates of hypothetical networks of varying sizes. Our results show that large extremes can be reliably detected with relatively small network, but also reveal a linear decay of detection probabilities towards smaller extreme events in log-log space. For instance, networks with ≈ 100 randomly placed sites in Europe yield a ≥ 90 % chance of detecting the largest 8 (typically very large) extreme events; but only a ≥ 50 % chance of capturing the largest 39 events. These finding are consistent with probability-theoretic considerations, but the slopes of the decay rates deviate due to temporal autocorrelation issues and the exact implementation of the extreme event detection algorithm. Using the examples of AmeriFlux and NEON, we then investigate to what degree ecological in-situ networks can capture extreme events of a given size. Consistent with our theoretic considerations, we find that today's systematic network designs (i.e. NEON) reliably detects the largest extremes. But the extreme event detection rates are not higher than they would be achieved by randomly designed networks. Spatiotemporal expansions of ecological in-situ monitoring networks should carefully consider the size distribution characteristics of extreme events if the aim is also to monitor their impacts in the terrestrial biosphere.
