English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Distribution and fate of sulfur intermediates – sulfite, thiosulfate, and elemental sulfur – in marine sediments

Zopfi, J., Ferdelman, T., & Fossing, H. (2004). Distribution and fate of sulfur intermediates – sulfite, thiosulfate, and elemental sulfur – in marine sediments. In J. Amend, K. Edwards, & a. T. Lyons (Eds.), Sulfur Biogeochemistry – Past and Present (pp. 97-116). Boulder, Colorado: Geological Society of America.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Zopfi4.pdf (Publisher version), 330KB
Name:
Zopfi4.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Zopfi, J.1, Author           
Ferdelman, T.1, Author           
Fossing, H., Author
Affiliations:
1Department of Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Max Planck Society, ou_2481693              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Most of the sulfide produced in surface marine sediments is eventually oxidized back to sulfate via sulfur compounds of intermediate oxidation state in a complex web of competing chemical and biological reactions. Improved handling, derivatization, and chromatographic techniques allowed us to more closely examine the occurrence and fate of the sulfur intermediates elemental sulfur (S0), thiosulfate (S2O32−), tetrathionate (S4O62−), and sulfite (SO32−) in Black Sea and North Sea sediments. Elemental sulfur was the most abundant sulfur intermediate with concentrations ~3 orders of magnitude higher than the dissolved species, which were typically in the low micromolar range or below. Turnover times of the intermediate sulfur compounds were inversely correlated with concentration and followed the order: SO3 2− ≈ S4O62− > S2O32− > S0. Experiments with anoxic but non-sulfi dic surface sediments from the Black Sea revealed that added sulfide and sulfite disappeared most rapidly, followed by thiosulfate. Competing chemical reactions, including the reaction of sulfite with sedimentary S0 that led to temporarily increased thiosulfate concentrations, resulted in the rapid disappearance of SO32−. Conversely, low thiosulfate concentrations in the Black Sea sediments (<3μM) were attributed to the activity of thiosulfate-consuming bacteria. Experiments with anoxic but non-sulfi dic sediments revealed that 1 mol of tetrathionate was rapidly converted to 2 moles of thiosulfate. This tetrathionate reduction was bacterially mediated and occurred generally much faster than thiosulfate consumption. The rapid reduction of tetrathionate back to thiosulfate creates a cul-de-sac in the sulfur cycle, with thiosulfate acting as a bottleneck for the oxidation pathways between sulfide and sulfate.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2004
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: 20
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: eDoc: 229432
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Sulfur Biogeochemistry – Past and Present
Source Genre: Book
 Creator(s):
Amend, J., Editor
Edwards, K.J., Editor
Lyons, and T.J., Editor
Affiliations:
-
Publ. Info: Boulder, Colorado : Geological Society of America
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 97 - 116 Identifier: -

Source 2

show
hide
Title: Geological Society of America Spec. Paper
Source Genre: Series
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 379 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: -