English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  MAX-DOAS measurements of HONO slant column densities during the MAD-CAT Campaign: inter-comparison and sensitivity studies on spectral analysis settings

Wang, Y., Beirle, S., Hendrick, F., Hilboll, A., Jin, J., Kyuberis, A. A., et al. (2017). MAX-DOAS measurements of HONO slant column densities during the MAD-CAT Campaign: inter-comparison and sensitivity studies on spectral analysis settings. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions, 10.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Wang, Y.1, Author              
Beirle, S.1, Author              
Hendrick, Francois, Author
Hilboll, Andreas, Author
Jin, Junli, Author
Kyuberis, Aleksandra A., Author
Lampel, J.1, Author              
Li, Ang, Author
Luo, Yuhan, Author
Lodi, Lorenzo, Author
Ma, Jianzhong, Author
Navarro , Monica, Author
Ortega, Ivan, Author
Peters, Enno, Author
Polyansky, Oleg L., Author
Remmers, J.1, Author              
Richter, Andreas, Author
Puentedura, Olga, Author
Van Rozendael, Michel, Author
Seyler, André, Author
Tennyson, Jonathan, AuthorVolkamer, Rainer, AuthorXie, Pinhua, AuthorZobov, Nikolai F., AuthorWagner, T.1, Author               more..
Affiliations:
1Satellite Remote Sensing, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Max Planck Society, ou_1826293              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: In order to promote the development of the passive DOAS technique the Multi Axis DOAS – Comparison cam- paign for Aerosols and Trace gases (MAD-CAT) was held at the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry in Mainz, Germany, from June to October 2013. Here, we systematically compare the differential slant column densities (dSCDs) of nitrous acid (HONO) derived from measurements of seven differ- ent instruments. We also compare the tropospheric difference of SCDs (delta SCD) of HONO, namely the difference of the SCDs for the non-zenith observations and the zenith ob- servation of the same elevation sequence. Different research groups analysed the spectra from their own instruments us- ing their individual fit software. All the fit errors of HONO dSCDs from the instruments with cooled large-size detectors are mostly in the range of 0.1 to 0.3 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 for an integration time of 1 min. The fit error for the mini MAX-DOAS is around 0.7 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 . Al- though the HONO delta SCDs are normally smaller than 6 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 , consistent time series of HONO delta SCDs are retrieved from the measurements of different instruments. Both fits with a sequential Fraunhofer reference spectrum (FRS) and a daily noon FRS lead to similar con- sistency. Apart from the mini-MAX-DOAS, the systematic absolute differences of HONO delta SCDs between the in- struments are smaller than 0.63 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 . The correlation coefficients are higher than 0.7 and the slopes of linear regressions deviate from unity by less than 16 % for the elevation angle of 1 ◦ . The correlations decrease with an increase in elevation angle. All the participants also analysed synthetic spectra using the same baseline DOAS settings to results from their re- spective fit programs. In general the errors are smaller than 0.3 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 , which is about half of the sys- tematic difference between the real measurements. The differences of HONO delta SCDs retrieved in the selected three spectral ranges 335–361, 335–373 and 335– 390 nm are considerable (up to 0.57 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 ) for both real measurements and synthetic spectra. We per- formed sensitivity studies to quantify the dominant system- atic error sources and to find a recommended DOAS set- ting in the three spectral ranges. The results show that wa- ter vapour absorption, temperature and wavelength depen- dence of O 4 absorption, temperature dependence of Ring spectrum, and polynomial and intensity offset correction all together dominate the systematic errors. We recom- mend a fit range of 335–373 nm for HONO retrievals. In such fit range the overall systematic uncertainty is about 0.87 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 , much smaller than those in the other two ranges. The typical random uncertainty is es- timated to be about 0.16 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 , which is only 25 % of the total systematic uncertainty for most of the instruments in the MAD-CAT campaign. In summary for most of the MAX-DOAS instruments for elevation an- gle below 5 ◦ , half daytime measurements (usually in the morning) of HONO delta SCD can be over the detection limit of 0.2 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 with an uncertainty of ∼ 0.9 × 10 15 molecules cm − 2 .

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2017
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.5194/amt-2016-387
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions
  Other : Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss.
  Abbreviation : AMTD
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Katlenburg-Lindau : Copernicus
Pages: 38 Volume / Issue: 10 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: Other: 1867-8610
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/1867-8610