Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

EndNote (UTF-8)
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Open to Feedback? Formal and Informal Recursivity in Creative Commons’ Transnational Standard-Setting

Dobusch, L., Lang, M., & Quack, S. (2017). Open to Feedback? Formal and Informal Recursivity in Creative Commons’ Transnational Standard-Setting. Global Policy, 8(3), 353-363. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12462.

Item is

Basisdaten

ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

ausblenden: Dateien
:
GP_8_2017_Quack.pdf (beliebiger Volltext), 600KB
Name:
GP_8_2017_Quack.pdf
Beschreibung:
Full text open access
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

ausblenden:
externe Referenz:
https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12462 (Verlagsversion)
Beschreibung:
Full text via publisher
OA-Status:

Urheber

ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Dobusch, Leonhard1, Autor
Lang, Markus2, Autor
Quack, Sigrid3, 4, Autor           
Affiliations:
1University of Innsbruck, Austria, ou_persistent22              
2Max Weber Institute for Sociology, Heidelberg, Germany, ou_persistent22              
3Assoziierte Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_2074316              
4Institut für Soziologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Germany, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: In this article, we examine how non-membership organizations that claim stewardship over a transnational public or common good, such as the environmental or digital commons, develop combinations of formal and informal recursivity to develop and maintain regulatory conversations with their dispersed user communities. Based on a case study of Creative Commons, an organization that developed what have become the most widely used open licenses for digital content, we show how rhetorical openness to informal feedback from legitimacy communities in different sectors and countries can improve the feasibility and diffusion of standards. However, as long as the standard-setter's methods of making decisions on the basis of such feedback remains opaque, its communities are likely to raise accountability demands for more extensive ex post justifications.

Details

ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2017-09-112017
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: Analytical Framework
The Case of Creative Commons
Advantages and disadvantages of informality
Conclusion
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12462
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

ausblenden:
Titel: Global Policy
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 8 (3) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 353 - 363 Identifikator: ISSN: 1758-5880
ISSN: 1758-5899