日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

  Acquiring and preprocessing leaf images for automated plant identification: understanding the tradeoff between effort and information gain

Rzanny, M., Seeland, M., Wäldchen, J., & Mäder, P. (2017). Acquiring and preprocessing leaf images for automated plant identification: understanding the tradeoff between effort and information gain. Plant Methods, 13:. doi:10.1186/s13007-017-0245-8.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
資料種別: 学術論文

ファイル

表示: ファイル
非表示: ファイル
:
BGC2756.pdf (出版社版), 2MB
ファイルのパーマリンク:
https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002E-2762-D
ファイル名:
BGC2756.pdf
説明:
-
OA-Status:
閲覧制限:
公開
MIMEタイプ / チェックサム:
application/pdf / [MD5]
技術的なメタデータ:
著作権日付:
-
著作権情報:
-

関連URL

表示:
非表示:
説明:
OA
OA-Status:

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Rzanny, Michael1, 著者           
Seeland, Marco, 著者
Wäldchen, Jana1, 著者           
Mäder, Patrick, 著者
所属:
1Department Biogeochemical Integration, Dr. M. Reichstein, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Society, ou_1688139              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: -
 要旨: Background: Automated species identification is a long term research subject. Contrary to flowers and fruits, leaves are available throughout most of the year. Offering margin and texture to characterize a species, they are the most studied organ for automated identification. Substantially matured machine learning techniques generate the need for more training data (aka leaf images). Researchers as well as enthusiasts miss guidance on how to acquire suitable training images in an efficient way. Methods: In this paper, we systematically study nine image types and three preprocessing strategies. Image types vary in terms of in-situ image recording conditions: perspective, illumination, and background, while the preprocessing strategies compare non-preprocessed, cropped, and segmented images to each other. Per image type-preprocessing combination, we also quantify the manual effort required for their implementation. We extract image features using a convolutional neural network, classify species using the resulting feature vectors and discuss classification accuracy in relation to the required effort per combination. Results: The most effective, non-destructive way to record herbaceous leaves is to take an image of the leaf’s top side. We yield the highest classification accuracy using destructive back light images, i.e., holding the plucked leaf against the sky for image acquisition. Cropping the image to the leaf’s boundary substantially improves accuracy, while precise segmentation yields similar accuracy at a substantially higher effort. The permanent use or disuse of a flash light has negligible effects. Imaging the typically stronger textured backside of a leaf does not result in higher accuracy, but notably increases the acquisition cost. Conclusions: In conclusion, the way in which leaf images are acquired and preprocessed does have a substantial effect on the accuracy of the classifier trained on them. For the first time, this study provides a systematic guideline allowing researchers to spend available acquisition resources wisely while yielding the optimal classification accuracy.

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語:
 日付: 2017-10-252017-11-08
 出版の状態: オンラインで出版済み
 ページ: -
 出版情報: -
 目次: -
 査読: -
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): その他: BGC2756
DOI: 10.1186/s13007-017-0245-8
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物 1

表示:
非表示:
出版物名: Plant Methods
種別: 学術雑誌
 著者・編者:
所属:
出版社, 出版地: BioMed Central
ページ: - 巻号: 13 通巻号: 97 開始・終了ページ: - 識別子(ISBN, ISSN, DOIなど): ISSN: 1746-4811
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/1000000000019420