English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Victims of Terrorism Policies : Should Victims of Terrorism be Treated Differently?

Albrecht, H.-J., & Kilchling, M. (2007). Victims of Terrorism Policies: Should Victims of Terrorism be Treated Differently? Fear v. Freedom Post 9/11 - the European Perspective, 13-31.

Item is

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Albrecht, Hans-Jörg1, Author              
Kilchling, Michael1, Author              
Affiliations:
1Criminology, Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, Max Planck Society, ou_2489695              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Producing large-scale victimization is one of the prime goals of terrorists worldwide. A regular characteristic not only of the unparalleled attacks of 9/11, with its more than 3,000 direct fatalities, is to provoke maximum public attention by producing as many casualties as possible. Victims fall prone to such events due to a terrorist preference for soft and symbolic targets. Not surprisingly, victims of terrorism receive particular attention when counter-terrorism policies are formulated. In practise, however, compensation and support for those directly or indirectly affected by terrorist acts is often rather poor. This article aims to analyse (i) the situation of victims of terrorism in a theoretical victimological framework, and (ii) legislation in favour of victims of terrorism from a comparative perspective. Significant differences can be found not only within Europe where victim policies are basically EU and CoE guided but likewise in comparison with the policies in the US and Israel, which have both implemented particular legislation for victims of terrorism decades ago. This article argues for the adoption of a principled approach to compensation based on social solidarity instead of tort law rules. Further attention is drawn to a particularly unprivileged group: those individuals who become victims of terrorist threats abroad and who, as a consequence of the territorial limitations applicable to compensation rules, have no access to victim compensation schemes in their home countries.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2007
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: eDoc: 330098
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Fear v. Freedom Post 9/11 - the European Perspective
Source Genre: Issue
 Creator(s):
Wade, Marianne1, 2, Editor            
Affiliations:
1 Criminal Law, Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, Max Planck Society, ou_2489694            
2 Section European Criminal Law, Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, Max Planck Society, ou_2489693            
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 13 - 31 Identifier: -

Source 2

show
hide
Title: European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 13 (1-2) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: -