English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Connectomes as constitutively epistemic objects: Critical perspectives on modeling in current neuroanatomy

Haueis, P., & Slaby, J. (2017). Connectomes as constitutively epistemic objects: Critical perspectives on modeling in current neuroanatomy. Progress in Brain Research, 233, 149-177. doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.05.002.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-002E-335B-4 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-5F0E-5
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Haueis, Philipp1, 2, Author              
Slaby, Jan3, Author
Affiliations:
1Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt University Berlin, Germany, ou_persistent22              
2Max Planck Research Group Neuroanatomy and Connectivity, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_1356546              
3Department of Philosophy and Humanities, FU Berlin, Germany, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Connectome; Philosophy of neuroscience; Epistemic object; Network society; Critical neuroscience
 Abstract: The term “connectome” is commonly taken to describe a complete map of neural connections in a nervous system of a given species. This chapter provides a critical perspective on the role of connectomes in neuroscientific practice and asks how the connectomic approach fits into a larger context in which network thinking permeates technology, infrastructure, social life, and the economy. In the first part of this chapter, we argue that, seen from the perspective of ongoing research, the notion of connectomes as “complete descriptions” is misguided. Our argument combines Rachel Ankeny's analysis of neuroanatomical wiring diagrams as “descriptive models” with Hans-Jörg Rheinberger's notion of “epistemic objects,” i.e., targets of research that are still partially unknown. Combining these aspects we conclude that connectomes are constitutively epistemic objects: there just is no way to turn them into permanent and complete technical standards because the possibilities to map connection properties under different modeling assumptions are potentially inexhaustible. In the second part of the chapter, we use this understanding of connectomes as constitutively epistemic objects in order to critically assess the historical and political dimensions of current neuroscientific research. We argue that connectomics shows how the notion of the “brain as a network” has become the dominant metaphor of contemporary brain research. We further point out that this metaphor shares (potentially problematic) affinities to the form of contemporary “network societies.” We close by pointing out how the relation between connectomes and networks in society could be used in a more fruitful manner.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2017-07-032017
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.05.002
PMID: 28826511
Other: Epub 2017
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Progress in Brain Research
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Amsterdam : Elsevier
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 233 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 149 - 177 Identifier: ISSN: 0079-6123
CoNE: /journals/resource/954926958899