English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Multiple Strategies for Spatial Integration of 2D Layouts within Working Memory

Meilinger, T., & Watanabe, K. (2016). Multiple Strategies for Spatial Integration of 2D Layouts within Working Memory. PLoS ONE, 11(4), 1-22. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154088.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0000-79F2-7 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-8790-3
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
Link (Any fulltext)
Description:
-

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Meilinger, T1, 2, 3, Author              
Watanabe, K, Author
Affiliations:
1Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497797              
2Project group: Social & Spatial Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2528706              
3Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497794              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Prior results on the spatial integration of layouts within a room differed regarding the reference frame that participants used for integration. We asked whether these differences also occur when integrating 2D screen views and, if so, what the reasons for this might be. In four experiments we showed that integrating reference frames varied as a function of task familiarity combined with processing time, cues for spatial transformation, and information about action requirements paralleling results in the 3D case. Participants saw part of an object layout in screen 1, another part in screen 2, and reacted on the integrated layout in screen 3. Layout presentations between two screens coincided or differed in orientation. Aligning misaligned screens for integration is known to increase errors/latencies. The error/latency pattern was thus indicative of the reference frame used for integration. We showed that task familiarity combined with self-paced learning, visual updating, and knowing from where to act prioritized the integration within the reference frame of the initial presentation, which was updated later, and from where participants acted respectively. Participants also heavily relied on layout intrinsic frames. The results show how humans flexibly adjust their integration strategy to a wide variety of conditions.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2016-04
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154088
eDoc: e0154088
BibTex Citekey: MeilingerW2016
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: PLoS ONE
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 11 (4) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 1 - 22 Identifier: -