English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Not all memories are the same: Situational context influences spatial recall within one’s city of residency

Meilinger, T., Frankenstein, J., Simon, N., Bülthoff, H., & Bresciani, J.-P. (2016). Not all memories are the same: Situational context influences spatial recall within one’s city of residency. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 23(1), 246-252. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0883-7.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0000-7A2E-5 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0000-7A2F-4
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
Link (Any fulltext)
Description:
-

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Meilinger, T1, 2, 3, Author              
Frankenstein, J1, Author              
Simon, N1, Author              
Bülthoff, HH1, 3, 4, Author              
Bresciani, J-P1, Author              
Affiliations:
1Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497797              
2Project group: Social & Spatial Cognition, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2528706              
3Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497794              
4Project group: Cybernetics Approach to Perception & Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2528701              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Reference frames in spatial memory encoding have been examined intensively in recent years. However, their importance for recall has received considerably less attention. In the present study, passersby used tags to arrange a configuration map of prominent city center landmarks. It has been shown that such configurational knowledge is memorized within a north-up reference frame. However, participants adjusted their maps according to their body orientations. For example, when participants faced south, the maps were likely to face south-up. Participants also constructed maps along their location perspective—that is, the self–target direction. If, for instance, they were east of the represented area, their maps were oriented west-up. If the location perspective and body orientation were in opposite directions (i.e., if participants faced away from the city center), participants relied on location perspective. The results indicate that reference frames in spatial recall depend on the current situation rather than on the organization in long-term memory. These results cannot be explained by activation spread within a view graph, which had been used to explain similar results in the recall of city plazas. However, the results are consistent with forming and transforming a spatial image of nonvisible city locations from the current location. Furthermore, prior research has almost exclusively focused on body- and environment-based reference frames. The strong influence of location perspective in an everyday navigational context indicates that such a reference frame should be considered more often when examining human spatial cognition.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2016-02
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0883-7
BibTex Citekey: MeilingerFSBB2015
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Psychonomic Bulletin Review
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 23 (1) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 246 - 252 Identifier: -