Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Comparison between filter- and optimization-based motion cueing in the Daimler Driving Simulator

Venrooij, J., Cleij, D., Katliar, M., Pretto, P., Bülthoff, H., Steffen, D., et al. (2016). Comparison between filter- and optimization-based motion cueing in the Daimler Driving Simulator. In DSC 2016 Europe: Driving Simulation Conference & Exhibition (pp. 31-38).

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Konferenzbeitrag

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
externe Referenz:
Link (beliebiger Volltext)
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Venrooij, J1, Autor           
Cleij, D1, 2, 3, Autor           
Katliar, M1, 2, 3, Autor           
Pretto, P1, 2, 3, Autor           
Bülthoff, HH1, 2, 4, Autor           
Steffen, D, Autor
Hoffmeyer, FW, Autor
Schöner, H-P, Autor
Affiliations:
1Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497797              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497794              
3Project group: Motion Perception & Simulation, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2528705              
4Project group: Cybernetics Approach to Perception & Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2528701              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: This paper describes a driving simulation experiment, executed on the Daimler Driving Simulator (DDS), in which a filter-based and an optimization-based motion cueing algorithm (MCA) were compared using a newly developed motion cueing quality rating method. The goal of the comparison was to investigate whether optimization-based MCAs have, compared to filter-based approaches, the potential to improve the quality of motion simulations. The paper describes the two algorithms, discusses their strengths and weaknesses and describes the experimental methods and results. The MCAs were compared in an experiment where 18 participants rated the perceived motion mismatch, i.e., the perceived mismatch between the motion felt in the simulator and the motion one would expect from a drive in a real car. The results show that the quality of the motion cueing was rated better for the optimization-based MCA than for the filter-based MCA, indicating that there exists a potential to improve the quality of the motion simulation with optimization-based methods. Furthermore, it was shown that the rating method provides reliable and repeatable results within and between participants, which further establishes the utility of the method.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n):
 Datum: 2016-09
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: BibTex Citekey: VenrooijCKPBS2016
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: DSC 2016 Europe: Driving Simulation Conference Exhibition
Veranstaltungsort: Paris, France
Start-/Enddatum: -

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: DSC 2016 Europe: Driving Simulation Conference & Exhibition
Genre der Quelle: Konferenzband
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: - Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 31 - 38 Identifikator: -