English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Comparison between filter- and optimization-based motion cueing in the Daimler Driving Simulator

Venrooij, J., Cleij, D., Katliar, M., Pretto, P., Bülthoff, H., Steffen, D., et al. (2016). Comparison between filter- and optimization-based motion cueing in the Daimler Driving Simulator. In DSC 2016 Europe: Driving Simulation Conference & Exhibition (pp. 31-38).

Item is

Basic

show hide
Genre: Conference Paper

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
Link (Any fulltext)
Description:
-
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Venrooij, J1, Author           
Cleij, D1, 2, 3, Author           
Katliar, M1, 2, 3, Author           
Pretto, P1, 2, 3, Author           
Bülthoff, HH1, 2, 4, Author           
Steffen, D, Author
Hoffmeyer, FW, Author
Schöner, H-P, Author
Affiliations:
1Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497797              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497794              
3Project group: Motion Perception & Simulation, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2528705              
4Project group: Cybernetics Approach to Perception & Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2528701              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: This paper describes a driving simulation experiment, executed on the Daimler Driving Simulator (DDS), in which a filter-based and an optimization-based motion cueing algorithm (MCA) were compared using a newly developed motion cueing quality rating method. The goal of the comparison was to investigate whether optimization-based MCAs have, compared to filter-based approaches, the potential to improve the quality of motion simulations. The paper describes the two algorithms, discusses their strengths and weaknesses and describes the experimental methods and results. The MCAs were compared in an experiment where 18 participants rated the perceived motion mismatch, i.e., the perceived mismatch between the motion felt in the simulator and the motion one would expect from a drive in a real car. The results show that the quality of the motion cueing was rated better for the optimization-based MCA than for the filter-based MCA, indicating that there exists a potential to improve the quality of the motion simulation with optimization-based methods. Furthermore, it was shown that the rating method provides reliable and repeatable results within and between participants, which further establishes the utility of the method.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2016-09
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: BibTex Citekey: VenrooijCKPBS2016
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: DSC 2016 Europe: Driving Simulation Conference Exhibition
Place of Event: Paris, France
Start-/End Date: -

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: DSC 2016 Europe: Driving Simulation Conference & Exhibition
Source Genre: Proceedings
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 31 - 38 Identifier: -