English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Depictive and metric body size estimation in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mölbert, S., Klein, L., Thaler, A., Mohler, B., Brozzo, C., Martus, P., et al. (2017). Depictive and metric body size estimation in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 57, 21-31. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.08.005.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0000-C286-D Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0000-FE7B-9
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
Link (Any fulltext)
Description:
-

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Mölbert, SC1, 2, Author              
Klein, L, Author
Thaler, A1, 3, Author              
Mohler, BJ1, 2, Author              
Brozzo, C1, 2, 3, Author              
Martus, P, Author
Karnath, H-O, Author
Zipfel, S, Author
Giel, KE, Author
Affiliations:
1Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497794              
2Research Group Space and Body Perception, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2528693              
3Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497797              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: A distorted representation of one's own body is a diagnostic criterion and core psychopathology of both anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN). Despite recent technical advances in research, it is still unknown whether this body image disturbance is characterized by body dissatisfaction and a low ideal weight and/or includes a distorted perception or processing of body size. In this article, we provide an update and meta-analysis of 42 articles summarizing measures and results for body size estimation (BSE) from 926 individuals with AN, 536 individuals with BN and 1920 controls. We replicate findings that individuals with AN and BN overestimate their body size as compared to controls (ES = 0.63). Our meta-regression shows that metric methods (BSE by direct or indirect spatial measures) yield larger effect sizes than depictive methods (BSE by evaluating distorted pictures), and that effect sizes are larger for patients with BN than for patients with AN. To interpret these results, we suggest a revised theoretical framework for BSE that accounts for differences between depictive and metric BSE methods regarding the underlying body representations (conceptual vs. perceptual, implicit vs. explicit). We also discuss clinical implications and argue for the importance of multimethod approaches to investigate body image disturbance.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2017-11
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.08.005
BibTex Citekey: MolbertKTMBMKZG2017
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Clinical Psychology Review
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 57 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 21 - 31 Identifier: -