English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Experimental evaluation of haptic support systems for learning a 2-DoF tracking task

D'Intino, G., Olivari, M., Geluardi, S., Venrooij, J., Pollini, L., & Bülthoff, H. (2017). Experimental evaluation of haptic support systems for learning a 2-DoF tracking task. In AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference: Held at the AIAA SciTech Forum 2017 (pp. 366-375). Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Genre: Conference Paper

Files

show Files

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
Link (Any fulltext)
Description:
-
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
D'Intino, G1, 2, 3, Author           
Olivari, M1, 2, 3, 4, Author           
Geluardi, S1, 2, 3, Author           
Venrooij, J1, 3, Author           
Pollini, L, Author           
Bülthoff, HH1, 2, 3, Author           
Affiliations:
1Department Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497797              
2Project group: Cybernetics Approach to Perception & Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2528701              
3Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497794              
4Project group: Motion Perception & Simulation, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2528705              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: This paper investigates use of a haptic support system for learning purposes. A 2 Degrees of Freedom (DoF) haptic force feedback system was designed for a dual-axes compensatory tracking task. The haptic system was used in a human-in-the-loop experiment with inexperienced participants on a fixed-base simulator. In the experiment, participants were divided into 3 groups. All participants performed 30 trials of the compensatory tracking task. One group of participants (NoHA group) performed the whole experiment without haptic aid. The other two groups (HA20 and HA10 groups) performed a training phase with haptic aid, followed by an evaluation phase without haptic feedback. The HA20 group performed 20 trials in the training phase, whereas the HA10 group performed only 10 trials. The results show that haptic aid was beneficial for performing the tracking task in the training phase for both the axes, compared to manual control. In the pitch axis performance of the HA20 group did not worsen when the feedback was switched off, whereas a considerable deterioration in performance was visible for HA10 group. Thus, haptic force feedback was effective to learn the control task in the pitch axis, compared to manual control. In the roll axis overall performance was found to be worse than the pitch axis. Moreover no benefits were found from training with haptic feedback in the roll axis for both the haptic groups.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2017-08
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-1083
BibTex Citekey: D039IntinoOGVPB2017
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference: Held at the AIAA SciTech Forum 2017
Place of Event: Grapevine, TX, USA
Start-/End Date: 2017-01-09 - 2017-01-13

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference: Held at the AIAA SciTech Forum 2017
Source Genre: Proceedings
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Red Hook, NY, USA : Curran
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 366 - 375 Identifier: ISBN: 978-1-5108-4395-0