English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse
  1. Start / 
  2. Item Summary / 
  3. View item

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
 DetailsSummary
  Effectiveness of the European Semester: Explaining Domestic Consent and Contestation

Maatsch, A. (2017). Effectiveness of the European Semester: Explaining Domestic Consent and Contestation. Parliamentary Affairs, 70(4), 691-709. doi:10.1093/pa/gsx021.

Item is

 

show all hide all

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-20C1-0 Version Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-20C2-F
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
mpifg_zs17_691.pdf (Any fulltext), 162KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
mpifg_zs17_691.pdf
Description:
Full text
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Private (embargoed till 2018-10-31)
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx021 (Publisher version)
Description:
Full text via publisher
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Maatsch, Aleksandra1, 2, Author           
Affiliations:
1Politische Ökonomie der europäischen Integration, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_1856345              
2Department of Social Sciences, University of Cologne, Germany, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Which factors explain domestic consent or contestation of European Union (EU) policy guidance issued within the framework of the European Semester (ES)? To address this question, this article analyses national parliamentary party positions on EU policy guidance in two cycles of the ES (2014 and 2015) in Austria, France, Germany and Ireland. Whereas parliamentary parties in Austria and Ireland expressed their consent to EU policy guidance, parliamentary parties in Germany and France were polarised. The empirical analysis presented in this article establishes that strong formal powers in budgetary matters are a prerequisite for parties to contest EU policy guidance. However, parliamentary party positions depend most on whether the content of EU policy guidance reflects a party’s economic interests.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2017-06-162017
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: 1. Introduction
2. What factors account for consent or contestation of EU policy guidance?
3. Research desgin
4. Empirical findings
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1093/pa/gsx021
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Parliamentary Affairs
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 70 (4) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 691 - 709 Identifier: ISSN: 0031-2290
ISSN: 1460-2482

Source 2

show
hide
Title: Analysing the Role of Parliaments in European Economic Governance
Source Genre: Issue
 Creator(s):
Cooper, Ian1, Editor
Maatsch, Aleksandra2, 3, Editor           
Smith, Julie4, Editor
Affiliations:
1 Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, European University Institute, Fiesole, Italy, ou_persistent22            
2 Politische Ökonomie der europäischen Integration, MPI for the Study of Societies, Max Planck Society, ou_1856345            
3 Department of Political Science, University of Cologne, Germany, ou_persistent22            
4 POLIS, University of Cambridge, UK, ou_persistent22            
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: - Identifier: -