Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Opposing and following responses in sensorimotor speech control: Why responses go both ways

Franken, M. K., Acheson, D. J., McQueen, J. M., Hagoort, P., & Eisner, F. (2018). Opposing and following responses in sensorimotor speech control: Why responses go both ways. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(4), 1458-1467. doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1494-x.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
Franken_etal_2018b.pdf (Verlagsversion), 2MB
Name:
Franken_etal_2018b.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Franken, Matthias K.1, 2, 3, Autor           
Acheson, Daniel J.1, 2, Autor           
McQueen, James M.1, 2, Autor           
Hagoort, Peter1, 2, Autor           
Eisner, Frank1, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, ou_persistent22              
2Neurobiology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_792551              
3International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_1119545              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: speech production, auditory feedback, speech perception, pitch
 Zusammenfassung: When talking, speakers continuously monitor and use the auditory feedback of their own voice to control and inform speech production processes. When speakers are provided with auditory feedback that is perturbed in real time, most of them compensate for this by opposing the feedback perturbation. But some speakers follow the perturbation. In the current study, we investigated whether the state of the speech production system at perturbation onset may determine what type of response (opposing or following) is given. The results suggest that whether a perturbation-related response is opposing or following depends on ongoing fluctuations of the production system: It initially responds by doing the opposite of what it was doing. This effect and the non-trivial proportion of following responses suggest that current production models are inadequate: They need to account for why responses to unexpected sensory feedback depend on the production-system’s state at the time of perturbation.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2018-05-222018-06-042018-08
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.3758/s13423-018-1494-x
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 25 (4) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 1458 - 1467 Identifikator: ISSN: 1069-9384
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954928526942