English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Corrigendum to “Time and potential resolved dissolution analysis of rhodium using a microelectrochemical flow cell coupled to an ICP-MS” [Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 677–680 (2012) 50–55] (S1572665712001865) (10.1016/j.jelechem.2012.05.006))

Klemm, S. O., Karschin, A., Mechler, A. K., Topalov, A. A., Katsounaros, I., & Mayrhofer, K. J. J. (2013). Corrigendum to “Time and potential resolved dissolution analysis of rhodium using a microelectrochemical flow cell coupled to an ICP-MS” [Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 677–680 (2012) 50–55] (S1572665712001865) (10.1016/j.jelechem.2012.05.006)). Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 693, 127. doi:10.1016/j.jelechem.2013.01.012.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-E3D1-2 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-E3D3-0
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Klemm, Sebasian Oliver1, Author              
Karschin, Arndt1, 2, Author              
Mechler, Anna Katharina1, Author              
Topalov, Angel Angelov1, Author              
Katsounaros, Ioannis1, Author              
Mayrhofer, Karl Johann Jakob1, Author              
Affiliations:
1Electrocatalysis, Interface Chemistry and Surface Engineering, Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH, Max Planck Society, ou_1863354              
2Insitut für Anorganische Chemie und Strukturchemie, Lehrstuhl I: Bioanorganische Chemie und Katalyse, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, Düsseldorf, Germany, persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: The authors regret that in the article an error during area normalization of the dissolution during potential step experiments occurred. All measurements and conclusions concerning potentiodynamic protocols are however unaffected by the errors described above and therefore still valid in the original form. The following corrections need to be considered: - The steady state dissolution rate calculated on page 54, end of 3rd paragraph, equals 3.9 pg s−1 cm−2, not “fg s−1 cm−2”. Therefore, in the abstract the steady-state dissolution “ranges around a few picograms per second and square centimeter” instead of femtograms.- The values in Fig. 6 have been corrected and are shown below:Taking the revised values, it can no longer be stated that potential steps yield lower dissolution rates than sweeps in identical potential windows. The dissolution integral observed during the step between 1 and 0 VSHE (7.7 ng cm−2) is in fact higher than the fast cycling experiments from Fig. 4 (3.87 ng cm−2 cycle−1). The initial assumption that both measurement protocols are directly comparable therefore appears unlikely. This originates most likely from the long hold periods at oxidizing and reducing potentials in the potentiostatic series, which are absent in the successive cycling used for potentiodynamic measurements. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2013-03-01
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2013.01.012
BibTex Citekey: Klemm2013127
ISSN: 15726657
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Amsterdam : Elsevier
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 693 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 127 Identifier: ISSN: 0022-0728
CoNE: /journals/resource/954928572675