Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Rapid timing of musical aesthetic judgments

Belfi, A. M., Kasdan, A., Rowland, J., Vessel, E. A., Starr, G. G., & Poeppel, D. (2018). Rapid timing of musical aesthetic judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(10), 1531-1543. doi:10.1037/xge0000474.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Belfi, Amy M.1, Autor
Kasdan, Anna2, Autor
Rowland, Jess 2, 3, Autor
Vessel, Edward Allen4, Autor           
Starr, G. Gabrielle 5, Autor
Poeppel, David2, 4, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Department of Psychological Science, Missouri University of Science and Technology, ou_persistent22              
2Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, USA, ou_persistent22              
3Lewis Center for the Arts, Princeton University, ou_persistent22              
4Department of Neuroscience, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2421697              
5Departments of English and Neuroscience, Pomona College, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: music, genre, liking, familiarity, timing
 Zusammenfassung: In recent years, psychological models of perception have undergone reevaluation due to a broadening of focus toward understanding not only how observers perceive stimuli but also how they subjectively evaluate stimuli. Here, we investigated the time course of such aesthetic evaluations using a gating paradigm. In a series of experiments, participants heard excerpts of classical, jazz, and electronica music. Excerpts were of different durations (250 ms, 500 ms, 750 ms, 1,000 ms, 2,000 ms, 10,000 ms) or note values (eighth note, quarter note, half note, dotted-half note, whole note, and entire 10,000 ms excerpt). After each excerpt, participants rated how much they liked the excerpt on a 9-point Likert scale. In Experiment 1, listeners made accurate aesthetic judgments within 750 ms for classical and jazz pieces, while electronic pieces were judged within 500 ms. When translated into note values (Experiment 2), electronica and jazz clips were judged more quickly than classical. In Experiment 3, we manipulated the familiarity of the musical excerpts. Unfamiliar clips were judged more quickly (500 ms) than familiar clips (750 ms), but there was overall higher accuracy for familiar pieces. Finally, we investigated listeners’ aesthetic judgments continuously over the time course of more naturalistic (60 s) excerpts: Within 3 s, listeners’ judgments differed between most- and least-liked pieces. We suggest that such rapid aesthetic judgments represent initial gut-level decisions that are made quickly, but that even these initial judgments are influenced by characteristics such as genre and familiarity.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - English
 Datum: 2018-05-252017-06-202018-05-252018-07-162018-10
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1037/xge0000474
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: Washington : American Psychological Association (PsycARTICLES)
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 147 (10) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 1531 - 1543 Identifikator: ISSN: 0096-3445
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925466244