English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  The Mental Representation of Inflected Words: An Experimental Study of Adjectives and Verbs in German

Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiss, S., Hadler, M., & Sonnenstuhl, I. (2001). The Mental Representation of Inflected Words: An Experimental Study of Adjectives and Verbs in German. Language, 77(3), 510-534. doi:10.1353/lan.2001.0140.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
clahsen_et_al_2001_the-mental-representation.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
clahsen_et_al_2001_the-mental-representation.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Private
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Clahsen, Harald1, Author
Eisenbeiss, Sonja2, Author
Hadler, Meike3, Author
Sonnenstuhl, Ingrid3, Author
Affiliations:
1University of Essex, Colchester, UK, ou_persistent22              
2Language Acquisition Group, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_55202              
3Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Adjectives, Verbs, Affixes, Words, Linguistic inflection, Stem form, Lexemes, Present tense
 Abstract: The authors investigate how morphological relationships between inflected word forms are represented in the mental lexicon, focusing on paradigmatic relations between regularly inflected word forms and relationships between different stem forms of the same lexeme. We present results from a series of psycholinguistic experiments investigating German adjectives (which are inflected for case, number, and gender) and the so-called strong verbs of German, which have different stem forms when inflected for person, number, tense, or mood. Evidence from three lexical-decision experiments indicates that regular affixes are stripped off from their stems for processing purposes. It will be shown that this holds for both unmarked and marked stem forms. Another set of experiments revealed priming effects between different paradigmatically related affixes and between different stem forms of the same lexeme. We will show that associative models of inflection do not capture these findings, and we explain our results in terms of combinatorial models of inflection in which regular affixes are represented in inflectional paradigms and stem variants are represented in structured lexical entries. We will also argue that the morphosyntactic features of stems and affixes form abstract underspecified entries. The experimental results indicate that the human language processor makes use of these representations.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2001-09
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1353/lan.2001.0140
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Language
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Washington, DC [etc.] : Linguistic Society of America [etc.]
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 77 (3) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 510 - 534 Identifier: ISSN: 0097-8507
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925466254