English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  What does finiteness mean to children? A cross-linguistic perspective onroot infinitives

Gretsch, P. (2004). What does finiteness mean to children? A cross-linguistic perspective onroot infinitives. Linguistics, 42(2), 419-468. doi:10.1515/ling.2004.014.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
gretsch_2004_what-does-finiteness-mean-to-children.pdf (Publisher version), 668KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
gretsch_2004_what-does-finiteness-mean-to-children.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Private
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Gretsch, Petra1, Author
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: The discussion on root infinitives has mainly centered around their supposed modal usage. This article aims at modelling the form-function relation of the root infinitive phenomenon by taking into account the full range of interpretational facets encountered cross-linguistically and interindividually. Following the idea of a subsequent ‘‘cell partitioning’’ in the emergence of form-function correlations, I claim that it is the major fission between [+-finite] which is central to express temporal reference different from the default here&now in tense-oriented languages. In aspectual-oriented languages, a similar opposition is mastered with the marking of early aspectual forms. It is observed that in tense-oriented languages like Dutch and German, the progression of functions associated with the infinitival form proceeds from nonmodal to modal, whereas the reverse progression holds for the Russian infinitive. Based on this crucial observation, a model of acquisition is proposed which allows for a flexible and systematic relationship between morphological forms and their respective interpretational biases dependent on their developmental context. As for early child language, I argue that children entertain only two temporal parameters: one parameter is fixed to the here&now point in time, and a second parameter relates to the time talked about, the topic time; this latter time overlaps the situation time as long as no empirical evidence exists to support the emergence of a proper distinction between tense and aspect.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 20062004
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1515/ling.2004.014
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Linguistics
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: The Hague : Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 42 (2) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 419 - 468 Identifier: ISSN: 0024-3949
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925421097