English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
 Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary
  Judicial review and the politics of comparative citations: Theory, evidence and methodological challenges

Hirschl, R. (2018). Judicial review and the politics of comparative citations: Theory, evidence and methodological challenges. In E. F. Delaney, & R. Dixon (Eds.), Comparative Judicial Review (pp. 403-422). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Item is

 

show all hide all

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-F491-7 Version Permalink: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0006-653C-6
Genre: Contribution to Collected Edition

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Hirschl_2018_Judicial.pdf (Any fulltext), 132KB
 
File Permalink:
-
Name:
Hirschl_2018_Judicial.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Restricted (Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, MPGS; )
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show
hide
Locator:
https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/comparative-judicial-review (Supplementary material)
Description:
Verlagslink
OA-Status:
Locator:
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2975986 (Any fulltext)
Description:
-
OA-Status:

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Hirschl, Ran1, Author           
Affiliations:
1Fellow Group Comparative Constitutionalism, MPI for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Max Planck Society, ou_2541693              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: comparative constitutional law; judicial review; comparative reference; comparative citations; constitutional borrowing; constitutional identity
 Abstract: What explains where, when and how the judicial imagination travels in its search for comparative reference? Possible answers emanate from: (i) historical accounts of engagement with the constitutive laws of others that examine episodes of selective constitutional borrowing and reference; (ii) comparative public law scholarship that stresses the significance of various structural and disciplinary elements, most notably legal training, legal tradition and linguistic capacity, in elucidating patterns of transnational judicial dialogue; and (iii) from social science accounts that stress the significance of strategic and socio-political factors in explaining selective judicial engagement with the constitutive laws of others. In this chapter, I elucidate the main findings and assess the contribution of each of these approaches.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2018
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.4337/9781788110600.00029
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Comparative Judicial Review
Source Genre: Collected Edition
 Creator(s):
Delaney, Erin F., Editor
Dixon, Rosalind, Editor
Affiliations:
-
Publ. Info: Cheltenham, UK : Edward Elgar
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 403 - 422 Identifier: ISBN: 978 1 78811 059 4