English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Potential and costs of carbon dioxide removal by enhanced weathering of rocks

Strefler, J., Amann, T., Bauer, N., Kriegler, E., & Hartmann, J. (2018). Potential and costs of carbon dioxide removal by enhanced weathering of rocks. Environmental Research Letters, 13(3): 034010, pp. 1-10. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c4.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Strefler_2018_Environ._Res._Lett._13_034010.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
Name:
Strefler_2018_Environ._Res._Lett._13_034010.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Strefler, Jessica, Author
Amann, Thorben1, Author           
Bauer, Nico, Author
Kriegler, Elmar, Author
Hartmann, Jens1, Author           
Affiliations:
1CRG Chemistry of Natural Aqueous Solutions, Research Area B: Climate Manifestations and Impacts, The CliSAP Cluster of Excellence, External Organizations, ou_2025293              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: enhanced weathering; carbon dioxide removal; supply curve; negative emissions; 1.5C; climate change; BASALT; DISSOLUTION; MINERALS; SOIL; CO2; OLIVINE; SCALES; FLUXES; RATES; CYCLE
 Abstract: Abstract The chemical weathering of rocks currently absorbs about 1.1 Gt CO2 a(-1) being mainly stored as bicarbonate in the ocean. An enhancement of this slow natural process could remove substantial amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere, aiming to offset some unavoidable anthropogenic emissions in order to comply with the Paris Agreement, while at the same time it may decrease ocean acidification. We provide the first comprehensive assessment of economic costs, energy requirements, technical parameterization, and global and regional carbon removal potential. The crucial parameters defining this potential are the grain size and weathering rates. The main uncertainties about the potential relate to weathering rates and rock mass that can be integrated into the soil. The discussed results do not specifically address the enhancement of weathering through microbial processes, feedback of geogenic nutrient release, and bioturbation. We do not only assess dunite rock, predominantly bearing olivine (in the form of forsterite) as the mineral that has been previously proposed to be best suited for carbon removal, but focus also on basaltic rock to minimize potential negative side effects. Our results show that enhanced weathering is an option for carbon dioxide removal that could be competitive already at 60 US $ t(-1) CO2 removed for dunite, but only at 200 US $ t(-1) CO2 removed for basalt. The potential carbon removal on cropland areas could be as large as 95 Gt CO2 a(-1) for dunite and 4.9 Gt CO2 a(-1) for basalt. The best suited locations are warm and humid areas, particularly in India, Brazil, South-East Asia and China, where almost 75% of the global potential can be realized. This work presents a techno-economic assessment framework, which also allows for the incorporation of further processes.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2018-01-172017-07-072018-01-232018-03-05
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaa9c4
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Environmental Research Letters
  Abbreviation : Environ. Res. Lett.
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Bristol : Institute of Physics
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 13 (3) Sequence Number: 034010 Start / End Page: 1 - 10 Identifier: ISSN: 1748-9326
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/1748-9326