English
 
Help Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Literate and preliterate children show different learning patterns in an artificial language learning task

Havron, N., Raviv, L., & Arnon, I. (2018). Literate and preliterate children show different learning patterns in an artificial language learning task. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science, 2, 21-33. doi:10.1007/s41809-018-0015-9.

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Havron2018_Article_LiterateAndPreliterateChildren.pdf (Publisher version), 514KB
Name:
Havron2018_Article_LiterateAndPreliterateChildren.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Havron, N.1, Author
Raviv, Limor2, 3, 4, Author           
Arnon, I.5, Author
Affiliations:
1Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, Dept d’Etudes Cognitives, ENSPSL University, EHESS, CNR, Paris, France, ou_persistent22              
2Psychology of Language Department, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, ou_792545              
3International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Nijmegen, NL, ou_1119545              
4Language Evolution and Adaptation in Diverse Situations (LEADS), MPI for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Society, Wundtlaan 1, 6525 XD Nijmegen, NL, ou_3368408              
5Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Literacy affects many aspects of cognitive and linguistic processing. Among them, it increases the salience of words as units of linguistic processing. Here, we explored the impact of literacy acquisition on children’s learning of an artifical language. Recent accounts of L1–L2 differences relate adults’ greater difficulty with language learning to their smaller reliance on multiword units. In particular, multiword units are claimed to be beneficial for learning opaque grammatical relations like grammatical gender. Since literacy impacts the reliance on words as units of processing, we ask if and how acquiring literacy may change children’s language-learning results. We looked at children’s success in learning novel noun labels relative to their success in learning article-noun gender agreement, before and after learning to read. We found that preliterate first graders were better at learning agreement (larger units) than at learning nouns (smaller units), and that the difference between the two trial types significantly decreased after these children acquired literacy. In contrast, literate third graders were as good in both trial types. These findings suggest that literacy affects not only language processing, but also leads to important differences in language learning. They support the idea that some of children’s advantage in language learning comes from their previous knowledge and experience with language—and specifically, their lack of experience with written texts.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 20182018-11-222018-12
 Publication Status: Issued
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1007/s41809-018-0015-9
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 2 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 21 - 33 Identifier: -