English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Possible artifacts in dynamic CEST MRI due to motion and field alterations

Zaiss, M., Herz, K., Deshmane, A., Kim, M., Golay, X., Lindig, T., et al. (2019). Possible artifacts in dynamic CEST MRI due to motion and field alterations. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 298, 16-22. doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2018.11.002.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-97A0-E Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-97A1-D
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Zaiss, M1, 2, Author              
Herz, K1, 2, Author              
Deshmane, A1, 2, Author              
Kim, M, Author
Golay, X, Author
Lindig, T, Author              
Bender, B, Author              
Ernemann, U, Author
Scheffler, K1, 2, Author              
Affiliations:
1Department High-Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497796              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497794              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Purpose Dynamic CEST studies such as dynamic glucose enhanced imaging, have gained a lot of attention recently. The expected CEST effects after injection are rather small in tissue especially at clinical field strengths (0.5–2%). Small movements during the dynamic CEST measurement together with a subtraction-based evaluation can lead to pseudo CEST effects of the same order of magnitude. These artifacts are studied herein. Methods A brain tumor patient 3D-CEST baseline scan without glucose injection performed at 3 T is used to generate a virtual dynamic measurement introducing different kinds of simulated motion and B0 shifts. Results Minor motion (0.6 mm translations) and B0 artifacts (7 Hz shift) can lead to pseudo effects in the order of 1% in dynamic CEST imaging. Especially around tissue interfaces such as CSF borders or tumor affected areas, the pseudo effect patterns are non-intuitive and can be mistaken as dynamic agent uptake. Conclusion Correction or mitigation for small motions is crucial for dynamic CEST imaging, especially in subjects with lesions. Concomitant B0 alterations can as well induce pseudo CEST effects at 3 T.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2018-112019-01
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2018.11.002
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Magnetic Resonance
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: San Diego [etc.] : Academic Press
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 298 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 16 - 22 Identifier: ISSN: 0022-2364
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954922651175_1