Deutsch
 
Hilfe Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Possible artifacts in dynamic CEST MRI due to motion and field alterations

Zaiss, M., Herz, K., Deshmane, A., Kim, M., Golay, X., Lindig, T., et al. (2019). Possible artifacts in dynamic CEST MRI due to motion and field alterations. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 298, 16-22. doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2018.11.002.

Item is

Basisdaten

einblenden: ausblenden:
Genre: Zeitschriftenartikel

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Beschreibung:
-
OA-Status:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Zaiss, M1, 2, Autor           
Herz, K1, 2, Autor           
Deshmane, A1, 2, Autor           
Kim, M, Autor
Golay, X, Autor
Lindig, T, Autor           
Bender, B, Autor           
Ernemann, U, Autor
Scheffler, K1, 2, Autor           
Affiliations:
1Department High-Field Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497796              
2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Max Planck Society, ou_1497794              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Purpose
Dynamic CEST studies such as dynamic glucose enhanced imaging, have gained a lot of attention recently. The expected CEST effects after injection are rather small in tissue especially at clinical field strengths (0.5–2%). Small movements during the dynamic CEST measurement together with a subtraction-based evaluation can lead to pseudo CEST effects of the same order of magnitude. These artifacts are studied herein.
Methods
A brain tumor patient 3D-CEST baseline scan without glucose injection performed at 3 T is used to generate a virtual dynamic measurement introducing different kinds of simulated motion and B0 shifts.
Results
Minor motion (0.6 mm translations) and B0 artifacts (7 Hz shift) can lead to pseudo effects in the order of 1% in dynamic CEST imaging. Especially around tissue interfaces such as CSF borders or tumor affected areas, the pseudo effect patterns are non-intuitive and can be mistaken as dynamic agent uptake.
Conclusion
Correction or mitigation for small motions is crucial for dynamic CEST imaging, especially in subjects with lesions. Concomitant B0 alterations can as well induce pseudo CEST effects at 3 T.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n):
 Datum: 2018-112019-01
 Publikationsstatus: Erschienen
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: -
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2018.11.002
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Journal of Magnetic Resonance
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: San Diego [etc.] : Academic Press
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 298 Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 16 - 22 Identifikator: ISSN: 0022-2364
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954922651175_1