日本語
 
Help Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存
 
 
ダウンロード電子メール
  Phenotypic variability and genetic architecture of limbs in populations and strains of the house mouse (Mus musculus)

Skrabar, N. (2018). Phenotypic variability and genetic architecture of limbs in populations and strains of the house mouse (Mus musculus). PhD Thesis, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
アイテムのパーマリンク: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-9C36-2 版のパーマリンク: https://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000D-548C-7
資料種別: 学位論文

ファイル

表示: ファイル
非表示: ファイル
:
Skrabar_Neva_thesis_2018.pdf (全文テキスト(全般)), 10MB
 
ファイルのパーマリンク:
-
ファイル名:
Skrabar_Neva_thesis_2018.pdf
説明:
-
OA-Status:
閲覧制限:
非公開
MIMEタイプ / チェックサム:
application/pdf
技術的なメタデータ:
著作権日付:
-
著作権情報:
-
CCライセンス:
-

関連URL

表示:

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Skrabar, Neva1, 著者           
Tautz, Diethard1, 学位論文主査                 
所属:
1Department Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Max Planck Society, ou_1445635              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: -
 要旨: Variability of phenotypes is an ubiquitous phenomenon in animals and plants that is considered to be the basis on which organisms undergo evolutionary changes. The present thesis addresses the variability and genetic basis of limb bone length phenotypes in different populations and strains. I included mice from four outbred populations (three from the subspecies M. m. domesticus and one from the subspecies M. m. musculus), as well as the commercially available outbred stock CD1 (Charles River) called cumulatively the "outbred group". The inbred strains are represented by PWD (a wild derived inbred strain from M. m. musculus) and C57BL/6J (a classical inbred strain originally derived from M. m. domesticus) cumulatively called the "inbred group". Further I used individuals from the first-generation offspring of mice captured in a natural hybrid zone between the two Mus musculus subspecies. To reduce environmental influences on the variability, all animals were kept under the same environmental conditions before their analysis. The first two chapters investigate mainly questions of developmental architecture. Chapter one deals with degrees of fluctuating asymmetry (FA). This is an indicator of developmental stability, reflected in the possibility of an organism to ensure the same phenotypic expression under the same genetic and environmental conditions on both sides of the body. I found that the first bone of the forelimb, the humerus, shows generally the highest level of FA. The lowest variance of bone length measures was found in inbred strains, but at least one of them (PWD) showed at the same time the highest level of FA. For the hybrid group I found the level of FA was not affected by the degree of hybridization and that they showed the highest level of stability. My results suggest a potential benefit of heterozygosity in the hybrid group, whereas the larger deviation observed in the inbred group might be a consequence of higher homozygosity. The second chapter examines covariation between bone lengths, which are considered to reflect levels of morphological integration. Close to natural populations are assumed to show greater level of integration due to a stronger influence of stabilizing selection which should affect the covariance structure. I found a higher degree of integration in the hybrid animals which was significant compared to the inbred and outbred groups. Outbred populations and inbred strains did not have larger differences except significantly higher integration in one population that belongs to the outbred stock (CD1). Moreover, different levels of integration could be noticed among populations of the hybrid group. Influence of size was also found as an important factor in shaping the overall integration in each observed group. In 8 addition, I investigated whether stronger connections could be found between developmentally related bones, which was supported in outbred and hybrid groups. The third chapter constitutes an approach to map genetic factors that generate limb variation and considers genetic variation that can affect multiple traits. In this part of the study, I used only mice from the hybrid zone, since these were previously shown to be suitable to conduct a genome wide association study with them. Based on the results from the second chapter which showed high phenotypic correlations, I asked whether traits that are developmentally and functionally related could have common genetic variants underlying these complex structures. Accordingly, special interest is given to genomic regions that underly individual bone length, as well as correlated variation between the bones. Overall, these traits revealed high heritability explained by genotyped markers, as well as a polygenic genetic architecture. Candidate genes previously described in limb and bone formation were identified together with genetic variants that were not previously reported in QTL studies of this phenotype. Further I found genetic regions (loci) associated with different bones, as well as high genetic correlations between the bones that share developmental mechanisms, i.e. serially homologous structures. Most interestingly, none of the genes known to be required for embryonic development of the limbs showed up as a factor shaping the adult development.

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語: eng - English
 日付: 2018-08-142018-08-14
 出版の状態: 受理 / 印刷中
 ページ: 136
 出版情報: Kiel : Christian-Albrechts-Universität
 目次: Table of Contents
Zusammenfassung .................................................................................................................................. 5
Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 7
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 9
Bone development .............................................................................................................................. 9
Limb bone evolution .......................................................................................................................... 11
Phenotypic variability ........................................................................................................................ 11
Canalization and developmental stability ....................................................................................... 12
Morphological integration ............................................................................................................. 12
Complex traits ................................................................................................................................... 13
Genome-wide association studies ...................................................................................................... 14
Origin of the house mouse ................................................................................................................. 14
Hybrid zone ................................................................................................................................... 15
Inbred strains................................................................................................................................. 16
Outbred stocks .............................................................................................................................. 17
Goals of the study ................................................................................................................................. 18
CHAPTER I ............................................................................................................................................. 20
Fluctuating asymmetry in Mus musculus ............................................................................................... 20
Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 20
Methods ............................................................................................................................................ 23
Mouse samples .............................................................................................................................. 23
Phenotypic measurements ............................................................................................................ 24
Measurement error ....................................................................................................................... 26
Fluctuating asymmetry (FA) indices ............................................................................................... 27
Directional asymmetry (DA) ........................................................................................................... 28
Normality and antisymmetry of the data ....................................................................................... 28
Character size ............................................................................................................................... 29
Differences between age and sex ................................................................................................... 29
Comparisons between populations / strains and groups ................................................................ 29
Results ............................................................................................................................................... 30
Measurement error ....................................................................................................................... 30
Preliminary analyses per population / strain and sex ...................................................................... 30
3
DA and antisymmetry per population / strain and hybrid subgroup ............................................... 32
DA and antisymmetry per group .................................................................................................... 33
Differences in bone length ............................................................................................................. 36
Comparisons of differences in FA ................................................................................................... 38
Differences between the bones per population / strain and group ................................................. 38
Differences between populations / strains and groups for the same bone ..................................... 40
Discussion .......................................................................................................................................... 46
Overview of differences in bone length .......................................................................................... 46
Differences in FA level.................................................................................................................... 46
Studies of FA in limb bones ............................................................................................................ 49
Conclusions........................................................................................................................................ 50
CHAPTER II............................................................................................................................................. 52
Morphological integration in Mus musculus limb elements ................................................................... 52
Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 52
Methods ............................................................................................................................................ 54
Mouse samples .............................................................................................................................. 54
Statistical analysis .......................................................................................................................... 55
Matrix repeatabilities ..................................................................................................................... 55
Matrix correlations ........................................................................................................................ 56
Partial correlations ........................................................................................................................ 57
Index of integration ....................................................................................................................... 57
Correction for variation due to size ................................................................................................ 58
Results ............................................................................................................................................... 59
Limb bone lengths ......................................................................................................................... 59
Matrix repeatability ....................................................................................................................... 61
Correlation and covariance matrices .............................................................................................. 62
Similarities between matrices ........................................................................................................ 64
Partial correlations in populations / strains and groups .................................................................. 65
Patterns of integration ................................................................................................................... 67
Discussion .......................................................................................................................................... 71
Conclusions........................................................................................................................................ 73
CHAPTER III............................................................................................................................................ 75
Using the Mus musculus hybrid zone to assess covariation
4
and genetic architecture of limb bone lengths ....................................................................................... 75
Introduction....................................................................................................................................... 76
Methods ........................................................................................................................................... 78
Mapping population ...................................................................................................................... 78
Phenotype measurements ............................................................................................................ 78
Association mapping ..................................................................................................................... 78
Statistical analysis ......................................................................................................................... 79
Genetic correlation ........................................................................................................................ 80
Phenotypic variance explained by each chromosome .................................................................... 80
Results .............................................................................................................................................. 80
Bone length measures and correlations ........................................................................................ 80
Genomewide association mapping and genetic architecture .......................................................... 80
Power to detect associations in the hybrid zone samples from simulation of additive model ......... 81
Candidate genes ............................................................................................................................ 81
Identifying genetic associations unique to individual bones by accounting
for covariation with another bone ................................................................................................. 81
Discussion ......................................................................................................................................... 82
Candidate genes ............................................................................................................................ 83
Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................ 86
Contributions to the thesis .................................................................................................................... 90
Perspectives ......................................................................................................................................... 91
Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................ 92
References ............................................................................................................................................ 94
Digital supplement .............................................................................................................................. 109
Curriculum vitae ................................................................................................................................. 112
Affidavit .............................................................................................................................................. 113
 査読: -
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): その他: Diss/13098
 学位: 博士号 (PhD)

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物

表示: