English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  No evidence for prosodic effects on the syntactic encoding of complement clauses in German

Kentner, G., & Franz, I. (2019). No evidence for prosodic effects on the syntactic encoding of complement clauses in German. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 4(1), 1-29.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0002-F81E-6 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-7660-B
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
No evidence for prosodic effects on the syntactic encoding of complement clauses in German.pdf (Any fulltext), 577KB
Name:
No evidence for prosodic effects on the syntactic encoding of complement clauses in German.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
2019
Copyright Info:
© 2019 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Kentner, Gerrit1, 2, Author              
Franz, Isabelle1, Author
Affiliations:
1Department of Language and Literature, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Max Planck Society, ou_2421695              
2Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, External Organizations, Frankfurt, Germany, ou_421891              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: syntax-phonology interface, German, linguistic rhythm, stress, complement clause, language production
 Abstract: Does linguistic rhythm matter to syntax, and if so, what kinds of syntactic decisions are susceptible to rhythm? By means of two recall-based sentence production experiments and two corpus studies – one on spoken and one on written language – we investigated whether linguistic rhythm affects the choice between introduced and un-introduced complement clauses in German. Apart from the presence or absence of the complementiser dass (‘that’), these two sentence types differ with respect to the position of the tensed verb (verb-final/verb-second). Against our predictions, that were based on previously reported rhythmic effects on the use of the optional complementiser that in English, the experiments fail to obtain compelling evidence for rhythmic/prosodic influences on the structure of complement clauses in German. An overview of pertinent studies showing rhythmic influences on syntactic encoding suggests these effects to be generally restricted to syntactic domains smaller than a clause. We assume that, in the course of language production, initially, clause level syntactic projections are specified; their specification is in fact the prerequisite for phonological encoding to start. Consequently, prosodic effects may only touch upon the lower level categories that are to be integrated into the clausal projection, but not upon the syntactic makeup of the higher order projection itself.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2019-01-31
 Publication Status: Published online
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: -
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Glossa: a journal of general linguistics
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 4 (1) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 1 - 29 Identifier: -