English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Prosodic properties, perception, and brain activity

Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Prosodic properties, perception, and brain activity. In Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 227-230). Berkeley: University of California.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-2B0E-F Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-2B0F-E
Genre: Conference Paper

Files

show Files

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Steinhauer, Karsten1, Author              
Alter, Kai2, Author              
Friederici, Angela D.2, Author              
Affiliations:
1MPI for Psychological Research (Munich, -2003), The Prior Institutes, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634573              
2MPI of Cognitive Neuroscience (Leipzig, -2003), The Prior Institutes, MPI for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Max Planck Society, ou_634574              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: This paper investigates how differences in syntactic structure influence the speaker's prosodic realization of temporarily ambiguous utterances and whether the respective prosodic information guides the listener's sentence comprehension. Exhaustive acoustic analyses of the speech signals as well as behavioral and event-related brain potential (ERP) data of 56 listeners revealed the following results. 1. As predicted by certain theories of syntax-prosody mapping, syntactic differences led to early characteristic changes in the prosodic pattern. 2. Prosodic differences involved word duration, pause insertion, pitch contours, and the loudness function of the speech signals. 3. The disambiguating prosodic cues were immediately decoded by the listeners and prevented them from initial misanalyses typically observed during reading. 4. The processing of Intonational Phrase (IPh) boundaries was reflected by a specific brain response in the ERP. 5. In the presence of other prosodic cues, pause insertion was completely dispensable for the marking and perception of IPh boundaries.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 1999
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: -
 Identifiers: -
 Degree: -

Event

show
hide
Title: 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 99)
Place of Event: San Francisco, CA
Start-/End Date: 1999-08-01 - 1999-08-07

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
Source Genre: Proceedings
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Berkeley : University of California
Pages: - Volume / Issue: - Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 227 - 230 Identifier: ISBN: 1-56396-899-1