English
 
User Manual Privacy Policy Disclaimer Contact us
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Dominant words rise to the top by positive frequency-dependent selection

Pagel, M., Beaumont, M., Meade, A., Verkerk, A., & Calude, A. (2019). Dominant words rise to the top by positive frequency-dependent selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(15), 7397-7402. doi:10.1073/pnas.1816994116.

Item is

Basic

show hide
Item Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-4D12-3 Version Permalink: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0004-EEFE-3
Genre: Journal Article

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
shh1204.pdf (Publisher version), 652KB
Name:
shh1204.pdf
Description:
OA
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-
License:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Pagel, Mark, Author
Beaumont, Mark, Author
Meade, Andrew, Author
Verkerk, Annemarie1, Author              
Calude, Andreea, Author
Affiliations:
1Linguistic and Cultural Evolution, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Max Planck Society, ou_2074311              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: language evolution, neutral drift, frequency-dependent selection, shared vocabulary, approximate Bayesian computation
 Abstract: Speakers of a language somehow come to use the same words to express particular meanings—}like {“}dog{”} or {“}table{”}{—}even though there is seldom a necessary connection between a word and its meaning, and there are often many alternatives from which to choose (e.g., {“}sofa,{”} {“}couch,{”} {“}settee{”}). We show that word choice is not just a matter of saying what others say. Rather, humans seem to be equipped with a bias that makes them disproportionately more likely to use the words that most others use. The force of this bias can drive competing words out, allowing a single word to dominate all others. It can also explain how languages spontaneously organize and remain relatively stable for centuries or even millennia.A puzzle of language is how speakers come to use the same words for particular meanings, given that there are often many competing alternatives (e.g., {“}sofa,{”} {“}couch,{”} {“}settee{”}), and there is seldom a necessary connection between a word and its meaning. The well-known process of random drift{—}roughly corresponding in this context to {“}say what you hear{”}{—}can cause the frequencies of alternative words to fluctuate over time, and it is even possible for one of the words to replace all others, without any form of selection being involved. However, is drift alone an adequate explanation of a shared vocabulary? Darwin thought not. Here, we apply models of neutral drift, directional selection, and positive frequency-dependent selection to explain over 417,000 word-use choices for 418 meanings in two natural populations of speakers. We find that neutral drift does not in general explain word use. Instead, some form of selection governs word choice in over 91% of the meanings we studied. In cases where one word dominates all others for a particular meaning{—}such as is typical of the words in the core lexicon of a language{—}word choice is guided by positive frequency-dependent selection{—a bias that makes speakers disproportionately likely to use the words that most others use. This bias grants an increasing advantage to the common form as it becomes more popular and provides a mechanism to explain how a shared vocabulary can spontaneously self-organize and then be maintained for centuries or even millennia, despite new words continually entering the lexicon.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2019-03-212019-04-09
 Publication Status: Published in print
 Pages: 6
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Method: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1816994116
Other: shh1204
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  Other : Proc. Acad. Sci. USA
  Other : Proc. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
  Other : Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA
  Abbreviation : PNAS
Source Genre: Journal
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: Washington, D.C. : National Academy of Sciences
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 116 (15) Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 7397 - 7402 Identifier: ISSN: 0027-8424
CoNE: https://pure.mpg.de/cone/journals/resource/954925427230